Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5475
Next month in: 00:28:37
Server time: 11:31:22, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): GLNBei | Mbites2 | rezins | SocDemDundorfian | Twilighty00 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: No Carbon Tax

Details

Submitted by[?]: Thatcherite Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 3141

Description[?]:

The name says it all, get rid of this pointless tax.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:00:46, June 21, 2011 CET
FromDemocratic Party
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageWhat are you trying? Submitting laws which make no sense. It is just fun from you and all new parties? I do not understand you.
DP

Date09:57:03, June 21, 2011 CET
FromThatcherite Alliance
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageNo, its so that we can get our positions up and that we may be able to win seats and all that. Ever thought of that one, Einstein?

Date15:54:16, June 21, 2011 CET
FromProgressive Party
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageMake no sense in what terms? YOUR terms? Everything I have submitted I completely want to see changed.

Regardless, The Progressive Party does not support this bill.

Date04:39:46, June 22, 2011 CET
FromFree Trade Party
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageJust because we don't follow your political agenda, doesn't mean we make no sense, it just means it's time for you to make a good argument for once.

Date08:24:25, June 22, 2011 CET
FromThatcherite Alliance
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageExactly, commies like you who call yourselves "Progressive" are all talk and so action.

Date09:24:03, June 22, 2011 CET
FromDémocraties Libérales
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageYou seem to have missed the point of this legislation C-RAFP.
This article isn't saying that industry is taxed, it is merely regulated so that it has to meet certain pollution benchmarks.

Date09:26:59, June 22, 2011 CET
FromThatcherite Alliance
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageWho cares, all this talk of global warming/climate change is nonsense. Doesn't matter how much we pollute or don't pollute in the end it is all natural and has been so since time began.

Date09:36:32, June 22, 2011 CET
FromDemocratic Party
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageThink about the people who must live near industrial areas and their health.
DP

Date09:43:39, June 22, 2011 CET
FromThatcherite Alliance
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageSo what? Thats their fault for choosing to live in that area. If it is so bad for them, then why don't they move?

Date10:19:50, June 22, 2011 CET
FromDémocraties Libérales
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessagePerhaps industry moved to them?

Date11:46:58, June 22, 2011 CET
FromDemocratic Party
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageWhat came first? Industry and human settlements? Think rationally. Ordinary people have little or no effect on the location of industry.
DP

Date12:49:00, June 22, 2011 CET
FromDeltarian Liberal Movement
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageLet the CUP say this once, and only once. This is most assuredly the independent nation of the Federal Republic of Deltaria. Not the Commonwealth of Australia. We are not trying to replicate that society, or advocate for a viewpoint therein - be creative, please.

Date13:11:54, June 22, 2011 CET
FromThatcherite Alliance
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageIf you hate pollution so bad, then you can all join us country bumpkins and help plant crops on the farm. How does that sound? A bit of good old fresh air.

Date03:46:16, June 23, 2011 CET
FromDémocraties Libérales
ToDebating the No Carbon Tax
MessageWell said CUP.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 42

no
     

Total Seats: 219

abstain
 

Total Seats: 111


Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

Random quote: "A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks." - Thomas Jefferson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 80