Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5476
Next month in: 01:35:46
Server time: 18:24:13, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dannypk19 | jebjab | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Civil Rights Reform Act I

Details

Submitted by[?]: Baltusian Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3165

Description[?]:

Civil Rights Reform Act

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:44:29, August 10, 2011 CET
FromPeople's Revolutionary Communist Party
ToDebating the Civil Rights Reform Act I
MessageArticle 3 is not civil rights reform, it legalizes racial discrimination.

Date22:24:52, August 10, 2011 CET
FromBaltusian Freedom Party
ToDebating the Civil Rights Reform Act I
MessageIt allows private organizations to choose. If they choose to segregate that is their loss.

Date23:54:21, August 10, 2011 CET
FromUnión Democrática
ToDebating the Civil Rights Reform Act I
MessageThis is anarchism, pure and simple.

-George Dumont, MP

Date23:54:55, August 10, 2011 CET
FromBaltusian Freedom Party
ToDebating the Civil Rights Reform Act I
MessageThis is Freedom Pure and simple

-Gavin Wachs

Date00:07:30, August 11, 2011 CET
FromUnión Democrática
ToDebating the Civil Rights Reform Act I
MessageMentally ill people and convicts allowed to carry concealed weapons and meet in large groups without exception? Sounds like a recipe for anarchy, if you ask me.

-Senator George Dumont

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 98

no
      

Total Seats: 302

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 121