We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Defcon Level System.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Republic Progressionist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3182
Description[?]:
| This bill will establish a national defcon system. It will have 4 levels. Level 1: Little to no threat to the nation. Military forces are on normal alert. Level 2: Moderate threat to the nation. Military forces are on heightened alert. Level 3: Severe threat to the nation. All police and military forces are on extremely high alert. State of emergency has been declared. International transport has been shut down. National transport is permitted. Level 4: Extreme threat to the nation. All police and military forces are on full alert. State of emergency has been declared. All areas of high civilian populace are evacuated. All forms of international transport are shut down. National transport is permitted but limited to rural areas. National transport to major areas is shut down. The defcon level can any party. When a threat is directly made on the nation the defcon level is automatically changed to level 3. Once the defcon level is raised to level 3 it can only be lowered when the threat is dealt with. It may be raised to level 4 by the Minister of Defence, head of state, or head of government. If this bill is passed it the defcon system will immediately go into effect. It will be set at defcon 1. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:15:37, September 12, 2011 CET | From |  United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the National Defcon Level System. |
| Message | You have the LUC's support. Were actually suprised that this hasn't been implimented before. -Zi Yanng LUC Defense Secretary |
| Date | 23:58:30, September 12, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the National Defcon Level System. |
| Message | We hope all parties will support this bill. -George Lekovo, Minister of Defence. |
| Date | 01:12:06, September 14, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the National Defcon Level System. |
| Message | Labour, though not traditional militarists, can agree with this simple and effective addition to help streamline national security at the federal level. Ryan Schroeder Leader, Labour Party |
| Date | 02:14:34, September 14, 2011 CET | From | Democratic Catholic Party | To | Debating the National Defcon Level System. |
| Message | "There is no reason to spread panic among the population. We have no threats, our borders are safe. Why this law?" Demetreo Nerx - Leader of SPP |
| Date | 04:13:08, September 14, 2011 CET | From | Federal Independent Party | To | Debating the National Defcon Level System. |
| Message | Extra bureaucracy at best. FIP Senate Minority Leader Jack Tormé |
| Date | 01:29:47, September 15, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the National Defcon Level System. |
| Message | It won't spread panic among the people. It will keep them safe and aware. Yes there have never been any threats but we can't use that as an excuse to not make a D.E.F.C.O.N. system. People have to be kept safe. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 44 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 381 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats. |
| Random quote: "No government has the right to tell its citizens when or whom to love. The only queer people are those who don't love anybody." - Rita Mae Brown |