We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE act 001: Defence Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Catholic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3186
Description[?]:
proposed by Sen. Ron Malione Shadow Minister of Defense for "People's Alliance" |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The Government leaves this to the army to decide upon.
Current: The use of land mines is allowed.
Proposed: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Current: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Proposed: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:37:12, September 20, 2011 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE act 001: Defence Reform |
Message | "No." Polly Coehn, Shadow Defence Secretary |
Date | 16:50:39, September 20, 2011 CET | From | United National Front | To | Debating the PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE act 001: Defence Reform |
Message | This is an excellent bill. You have our support. |
Date | 21:25:53, September 20, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE act 001: Defence Reform |
Message | The PSCP agrees with the Unionist, never thought I'd say that, all of these changes aren't necacary and are fine as there are. -Jack Hennington |
Date | 22:08:52, September 20, 2011 CET | From | United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE act 001: Defence Reform |
Message | The United Liberal Caucus would support a seperate vote on articles 2 & 3. But as the bill stands...no -Grace S. Lough Speaker of the United Liberal Caucus |
Date | 04:38:44, September 21, 2011 CET | From | Chann National Party (CNP) | To | Debating the PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE act 001: Defence Reform |
Message | We support this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 81 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 344 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws. |
Random quote: "The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." - Aristotle |