We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Infrastructure Reform Act of 3185
Details
Submitted by[?]: Chann National Party (CNP)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3187
Description[?]:
| An act to reform government stance on various infrastructure issues in order to provide an environment in which goods and services can serve more effectively and efficiently, thereby contributing to the growth of the economy. Nuclear Power is the most efficient source of energy available to us and contrary to what some might say, can be a safe and sustainable source of energy as well as a boost to the economy in terms of decreasing our dependency on foreign sources of energy as well as providing jobs to the Solentian people. Contracting public works initiatives and working alongside private companies will give a boost to the private sector (where most jobs are created) and will create jobs for the Solentian People. This also devolves federal responsibility so that the cost of running government is lowered since we do not have to run a separate public works bureaucracy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: Nuclear power plants are not permitted.
Current: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Proposed: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Public works initiatives
Old value:: The government funds a program to build public works.
Current: The government funds a program to build public works.
Proposed: The government contracts with private corporations to build public works.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:32:20, September 21, 2011 CET | From |  Labour Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Act of 3185 |
| Message | Labour worked damn hard to bring about the government's current public works policy. We will not vote to end it. As for nuclear energy, I am supportive, although you will find that the other parties will oppose, just as they opposed my bill earlier. Senator Schroeder |
| Date | 22:50:09, September 21, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Act of 3185 |
| Message | The PSCP would prefer not to encourage using nonrenewable resources. |
| Date | 22:51:56, September 23, 2011 CET | From | United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Act of 3185 |
| Message | We cant support article 2 -Grace S. Lough |
| Date | 13:13:54, September 24, 2011 CET | From | Democratic Catholic Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Act of 3185 |
| Message | "We demand the vote separated. We support only the art. 2 " Kate House candidate for Science and Technology for "People's Alliance" |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 220 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 205 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "How much more grievous are the consequences of anger than the causes of it." - Marcus Aurelius |