We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: WMD Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Urban Party of Rutania
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3208
Description[?]:
A bill to allow the unrestricted use of Biological, Chemical and Nuclear weapons in times of war. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation can only use chemical or biological weapons on non-civilan areas.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if victory is not feasibile by other means.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:30:37, November 03, 2011 CET | From | Rutanian Elitist Party | To | Debating the WMD Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The REP strongly supports this bill. Adam Roberts, Member of Parliament, Republican Elitist Party |
Date | 16:38:57, November 03, 2011 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Front | To | Debating the WMD Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The DSF shall not support this bill. We wonder why the UPR would move such a notion now? We hope no plans are being hatched. Lester Lynch, Leader of the Democratic Socialist Front. |
Date | 17:01:19, November 03, 2011 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the WMD Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The Conservative Party will not support this bill. Harry Clinton, Leader of the Conservative Party. |
Date | 17:38:09, November 03, 2011 CET | From | Libertarian Freedom Party | To | Debating the WMD Act |
Message | Mr.Speaker, The Liberal Democracy Party will not support this bill. Mitch Phillips, Leader of LDP |
Date | 23:44:58, November 03, 2011 CET | From | Urban Party of Rutania | To | Debating the WMD Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, It seems the liberal parties in the Parliament are soft when it comes to protecting this nation against foreign threats. They would rather appease our enemies instead of striking them down when necessary. Marshall Conway UPR Congressional Leader |
Date | 01:06:23, November 04, 2011 CET | From | Libertarian Freedom Party | To | Debating the WMD Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The Liberal Democracy may be soft when it comes to this issue, but the party has good enough reasons why they believe in these current laws. The Liberal Democracy Party believes in these current laws because: 1) Civilians of a foreign country should not be victims of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons and 2) Nuclear weapons are dangerous and should only be used as a last resort. Mitch Phillips, Leader of LDP |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 307 | |||
no | Total Seats: 115 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 76 |
Random fact: It is forbidden to impersonate a player or Moderator. |
Random quote: "We shall fight against them, throw them in prisons and destroy them." - Vladimir Putin |