Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 01:27:06
Server time: 06:32:53, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): blowingnorthwind | Drax | luthorian3059 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 3215

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Liberal Caucus

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 3216

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:59:57, November 21, 2011 CET
From Democratic Catholic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3215
MessageSorry, we can not accept to govern with Libertarians and PSCP. Our solution is one that we previously proposed. We say "NO" to large nonsense patchwork.

Date03:50:37, November 21, 2011 CET
From United Liberal Caucus
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3215
MessageWell there are not libertarians in this cabinet.

Date14:14:20, November 21, 2011 CET
From Federal Republic Progressionist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3215
MessageYou wanted a new cabinet because the current one does not have majority in the senate. Now you want to make a cabinet that excludes the largest party. Make up your mind.

Date14:49:11, November 21, 2011 CET
From United Liberal Caucus
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3215
MessageThis is the best possible way to include both the more left-wing parties and some of the right wing parties. Also this cabinet has a strong majority of the Senate, while the one proposed by the SPP has a 2 seat majority.

Date15:01:01, November 21, 2011 CET
From Democratic Catholic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3215
MessageSorry, it's time to be serious. The "civil revolution" that attracts the PSCP is light years away from us. Their economic proposals were always negative for us. We have no compatibility.

Date21:39:33, November 21, 2011 CET
From Federal Republic Progressionist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3215
MessageTbuis cabinet will do much better than the current one, in which the majority hasn't even done anything in quite some time.

Date21:40:04, November 21, 2011 CET
From Federal Republic Progressionist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3215
MessageThis cabinet will do much better than the current one, in which the majority hasn't even done anything in quite some time.

Date12:59:02, November 22, 2011 CET
From Democratic Catholic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3215
MessageGiven the recent bills submitted by the PSCP, we not vote of confidence in this government. The seats do not interest us. Who wants to sit comfortable with the hypocrisy in their pockets, take a seat: we will not.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 216

no
 

Total Seats: 51

abstain
   

Total Seats: 158


Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting.

Random quote: "The true destiny of America is religious, not political: it is spiritual, not physical." - Alvin R. Dyer

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59