We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Post Office Regulation Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Reform Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2147
Description[?]:
| Because private post office agencies are currently unregulated. We propose the regulation of these private agencies to ensure that nothing illegal is transported through them. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: There is a nationalised post office. Private post office agencies are allowed to exist, and the services provided by them are not regulated.
Current: There is a nationalised post office. Private post office agencies are allowed to exist, and the services provided by them are not regulated.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:11:17, November 26, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Post Office Regulation Bill |
| Message | The FP believes that the nationalised post office with naturally triumph over the private, unregulated ones. Why? Because the regulation of the nationalised post office holds them to a higher standard and therefore better quality will be victorious over the poor quality. |
| Date | 23:16:51, November 26, 2005 CET | From | Social Reform Party | To | Debating the Post Office Regulation Bill |
| Message | However, because the private ones are unregulated, they could simply be used to habour criminal activity. |
| Date | 23:29:55, November 26, 2005 CET | From |  Fair Capitalism Party | To | Debating the Post Office Regulation Bill |
| Message | If they were, for instance, violating the letter opening policy, they would be shut down as illegal. Lack of specific regulation != complete immunity. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 64 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 314 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 22 |
| Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." - Mahatma Gandhi |