We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Danger to the Public Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party of Darnussia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2148
Description[?]:
| I might aswell Put Forward a Populist bill that will close a month before the election! I need to regain seats somehow.... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Current: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Proposed: All wild animals may be kept as pets, without any restrictions or precautions whatsoever.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:46:08, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Danger to the Public Act |
| Message | ercentage Choice 10.89% The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned. 13.24% The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets. 23.80% Wild animals may be kept as pets; the owners of dangerous wild animals must take the necessary measures to ensure they can't escape. 34.17% All wild animals may be kept as pets, without any restrictions or precautions whatsoever. 17.91% This matter is left up to the local governments. |
| Date | 03:08:37, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Danger to the Public Act |
| Message | And yet your proposing something against the will of 65.84% of a sampled group of people. |
| Date | 04:01:31, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the Danger to the Public Act |
| Message | This goes against everything you stand for just to gain seats. You sir, are an idiot, a greedy idiot too. You do understand that even if you hold the most seats and you have the power to pass all the old bills you wished to pass, the voters will notice this and switch their votes once more. This will leave you with no seats at all and all your bills would be reversed. This basically gets you nowhere. |
| Date | 17:17:53, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the Danger to the Public Act |
| Message | You've been populist for a while, what's changing? |
| Date | 18:13:59, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the Danger to the Public Act |
| Message | Hey everyone, say hello to Fido my pet KILLER CHINCHILLA! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 14 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 147 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 40 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "The experience of ages has shown that a man who works on the land is purer, nobler, higher, and more moral... Agriculture should be at the basis of everything." - Mikuláš Gogolský, former Deltarian writer |