Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:35:37
Server time: 20:24:22, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Infrastructure Admendment Act 2147

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Democrat Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2175

Description[?]:

This it to update our old infrastucture laws.. To update them for the will of the people today

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:13:55, November 29, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Admendment Act 2147
MessageThe DSP supports all articles except article 1. Isn't it bascally saying the same thing as the old value except cutting out the part about volunteering?

Date01:24:46, November 29, 2005 CET
FromPragmatic Symphony Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Admendment Act 2147
MessageWe object to article III... there is no oil shortage and alternatives are universally inefficient. We suggest using government funds to improve fuel efficiency rather than pour research money into proven energy sinks.

Date03:49:45, November 29, 2005 CET
FromVanuku Conservative Caucus
ToDebating the Infrastructure Admendment Act 2147
Messagewe are curious as to the need for change in art. II

Date00:05:02, November 30, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Admendment Act 2147
MessageWell, FA, there has to be a minimum security between private mailing companies, and the government is the one to enforce it.

Prag. Party, this year, Massachusetts could have rolling blackouts, so don't say there is an oil shortage. And we would ut money into alternative energy sources so they DID work well. Even if we do increase oil efficentcy, we will still run out of oil within the century, proabably in the next five decades.

Date01:59:54, November 30, 2005 CET
FromNational Unity Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Admendment Act 2147
Messagewe completly support all articles

Date18:26:22, November 30, 2005 CET
FromPragmatic Symphony Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Admendment Act 2147
MessageThere is no oil shortage IRL. There is a CHEAP oil shortage. Canada has more oil in just ALBERTA than there ever was in Saudi Arabia... it's just more expencive to get at. Once prices reach $60 a barrel, it'll start flowing again.

Date00:46:16, December 02, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Admendment Act 2147
Messagew/e

Date11:21:30, December 11, 2005 CET
FromVanuku Labour Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Admendment Act 2147
MessageI support this act

Date08:40:23, December 16, 2005 CET
FromVanuku Labour Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Admendment Act 2147
MessageI Think We Need To Send This Act To A Vote.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 322

no
  

Total Seats: 238

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed.

Random quote: "There is only one difference between dictatorship and democracy. In democracy, you vote and then take orders; in dictatorship you don't waste time voting." - Joseph Stalin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 75