Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5475
Next month in: 00:41:31
Server time: 11:18:28, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Mbites2 | rezins | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Civil Liberties Bill 3295

Details

Submitted by[?]: Luthori Labour Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3296

Description[?]:

The LLP passionately believe in freedom and propose the wide-ranging Civil Liberties Bill 3295 for your due consideration.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:23:18, April 28, 2012 CET
FromLuthori Tory Party
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill 3295
MessageMr. Speaker,

No, no, no, no, no.

I yield the floor.

Date02:25:08, April 28, 2012 CET
FromUnited Democrats of Luthori
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill 3295
MessageThere is a lot of 'experimental' proposals here that we would like to debate on in the future, but we cannot accept this in its current form.

Date05:02:38, April 28, 2012 CET
FromNational Communist Party
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill 3295
MessageMr Speaker,

The UDL and the LCTP both need to wake up and smell the coffee! This is a better proposal than any i have seen so far! All parties should vote for this and move into the modern era! The UDL has joined an international organisation for socialistic parties! WHAT A JOKE! Socialists, Communists, and Marxist should support this hugely progressive policy! There are no experimental policies in this proposal at all! This is an equality promoting bill that we will support fully!

Kirk Davids,
Leader of the NMP

Date05:14:56, April 28, 2012 CET
FromUnited Democrats of Luthori
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill 3295
MessageMr. Speaker,

We would've preferred to have debated on certain issues separately. Perhaps in the future issues can be addressed in a less 'gung-ho' manner.

Date06:04:29, April 28, 2012 CET
FromUnited Democrats of Luthori
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill 3295
MessageMr Speaker,

I also resent the implication that my party shouldn't be a member of a socialist organization. We also believe that the devolutive effect that Marxism would have on the populous would completely overshadow any positive affect that the party might have on the nation.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 0

no
  

Total Seats: 649

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

    Random quote: "Apparently, a democracy is a place where numerous elections are held at great cost without issues and with interchangeable candidates." - Gore Vidal

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 101