We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ecology Conservation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patterson House
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3299
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: It is the responsibility of local governments to decide on waste disposal regulation.
Current: Private companies are responsible for disposing of their own waste. The government disposes of residential waste.
Proposed: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation.
Current: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Proposed: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on whaling.
Old value:: Local governments decide about whaling.
Current: Whaling is illegal.
Proposed: Commercial whaling is illegal, but whaling for scientific purposes is allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:38:50, May 03, 2012 CET | From |  Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Ecology Conservation |
| Message | The Patterson Family fails at industry. Please, do not spread the failure... http://classic.particracy.net/viewnews.php?newsid=334698&nation=9 Leave things to local governments so that parts of Beluzia, under control of the Karav family, can maintain good economic conditions without all this regulation. Every parish is free to set their own internal laws. We see how Patterson policy fails in Negunia; do not impose your failure on all of Beluzia. |
| Date | 21:50:54, May 03, 2012 CET | From | Patterson House | To | Debating the Ecology Conservation |
| Message | Things failed because of the national law, which you refuse to change! |
| Date | 21:56:49, May 03, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Ecology Conservation |
| Message | The national law allowed local government to control their own affairs. Iker Ado and Parlos Decina have good economies. Negunia's economy has failed. There should be attention paid to the coincidence of Negunia under Patterson control. This shows that Patterson policy, if applied to federal/national law, may spread the failure. The Karav family has never been in control of Negunia. We have gained, at different times, control of every other parish, but never Negunia. |
| Date | 21:57:58, May 03, 2012 CET | From | Patterson House | To | Debating the Ecology Conservation |
| Message | What does this bill have to do with the closing of a factory? |
| Date | 22:01:14, May 03, 2012 CET | From | Patterson House | To | Debating the Ecology Conservation |
| Message | OOC: Really, that newspaper just puts random stories in. It's just a coincidence that the story was made when I took control of the area. |
| Date | 22:08:28, May 03, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Ecology Conservation |
| Message | OOC: No... Companies actually close when economic regulation is overbearing. The other stuff are mostly random, but factories close when there is either too much regulation, or too high corporation tax. Ideally, I would like a high corporation tax, but I only set it to 10% so Beluzia can be a place for many companies to provide jobs. Blaming you is not only RP. You have control of Negunia because Negunia citizens like your views. The nation is federalized. Negunia sets policies that you are most likely to want, because I allowed that responsibility to go to the local government. If we set 1 flat out law, your failure will spread. |
| Date | 05:45:18, May 06, 2012 CET | From | House of Amistad | To | Debating the Ecology Conservation |
| Message | I am not sure why Article 3 (economic issue)was tied to the first two ( General Public Health & Enviroment). Can this be resubmitted as two distinct issues. |
| Date | 05:47:20, May 06, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Ecology Conservation |
| Message | Article 3 is an Ecology matter. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 60 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 28 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 11 |
| Random fact: Whilst the use of non-English languages can be appropriate for nation names, party names, constitutional titles and other variables, English is the official language of communication in the game. All descriptive texts and public communications should be in English or at least appear alongside a full English translation. |
| Random quote: "A cynic is a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin." H. L. Mencken |