We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Compromise Cabinet of March 2149 (minor edits)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social-Liberty Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2150
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the Szef Walruziańskiej Ligi Socjalistycznej i Republiki Walruzyjskiej chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the 
Alliance for Natural Law
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Restoration Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Social-Liberty Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Libertarian Party of Valruzia
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Libertarian Party of Valruzia
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Alliance for Natural Law
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the 
Liberal Democrats
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Deadly Buzz Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Deadly Buzz Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Libertarian Party of Valruzia
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Liberal Democrats
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Social-Liberty Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:37:11, December 02, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberty Party | To | Debating the Compromise Cabinet of March 2149 (minor edits) |
| Message | Any further changes needed? |
| Date | 05:30:17, December 02, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Compromise Cabinet of March 2149 (minor edits) |
| Message | Er wait no. Want to keep Foreign Affairs. And not particularly fond of Sci & Tech. |
| Date | 05:31:18, December 02, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Compromise Cabinet of March 2149 (minor edits) |
| Message | Would rather go with LP's cabinet at that. |
| Date | 09:20:07, December 02, 2005 CET | From | Restoration Party | To | Debating the Compromise Cabinet of March 2149 (minor edits) |
| Message | SLP...thanks for trying to include me in a cabinet. Not sure i participate with this particular coaltion with such a small portfolio. |
| Date | 15:08:52, December 02, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Compromise Cabinet of March 2149 (minor edits) |
| Message | @anl: Trade? Sci& tech vs. Healt and soc serv? |
| Date | 16:36:54, December 02, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Compromise Cabinet of March 2149 (minor edits) |
| Message | S&T's better than a number of positions. Basically, I want to keep FA regardless. And I really don't want HSS, T&I, or F&A. The former is a wlefare agency, the latter two regulatory. (E&T is a different story). I think you may have had S&T in the original, version, don't recall exactly though. . . The original version I had F&A and Justice. Should have just kept my mouth shut. |
| Date | 19:39:03, December 02, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberty Party | To | Debating the Compromise Cabinet of March 2149 (minor edits) |
| Message | Lol. Hmm....If you all want some more changes thats fine |
| Date | 19:44:09, December 02, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberty Party | To | Debating the Compromise Cabinet of March 2149 (minor edits) |
| Message | Well if RP doesn't want in on this one than we can switch seats around more easily anyways.....Hmmm |
| Date | 19:49:14, December 02, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Compromise Cabinet of March 2149 (minor edits) |
| Message | Thank you SLP. |
| Date | 05:25:46, December 03, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberty Party | To | Debating the Compromise Cabinet of March 2149 (minor edits) |
| Message | Wait...how did this pass....I'm confused |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 125 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 45 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 31 |
| Random fact: Cultural Protocol bills must provide a real-life equivalent or short description for the ethnic groups, languages and religions contained in them, such that it would be easy for an unfamiliar player to understand (e.g. "Dundorfian = German"). Where appropriate, they should also provide guidance to players on where to find help with translations and character names. This might include, for example, links to Google Translate, Behind the Name's Random Name Generator and Fantasy Name Generators. |
| Random quote: "There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences. " - P. J. O Rourke |