Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 00:34:25
Server time: 19:25:34, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (7): Aren | Arusu-Gad | caesar8293_ | Dx6743 | luthorian3059 | Moderation | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Infrastructure Reform Bill of 3314

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Front

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3315

Description[?]:

Proposed amendments

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:04:08, June 05, 2012 CET
From Communist Party of Jelbania
ToDebating the Infrastructure Reform Bill of 3314
MessageWe will support all articles of this bill and have confidence in the Minister of Infrastructure and Transport.

Date07:41:35, June 06, 2012 CET
From United New Jelbania
ToDebating the Infrastructure Reform Bill of 3314
MessageWe support the resolution filed by our colleagues from the Democratic Font Party

Date17:46:40, June 06, 2012 CET
From Jelbanian Democratic Party
ToDebating the Infrastructure Reform Bill of 3314
MessageAlthough we disagree with the Fire Prevention Measures, the Freedom Party has the utmost confidence in the Democratic Front's other three Articles and fully endorse them, and thus agrees with the Bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 649

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "A theory that seems to explain everything is just as good at explaining nothing"- Christopher Hitchens

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 69