We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Call for early elections, February 3332
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union for Victory
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: October 3332
Description[?]:
| We, the House of Adamson, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:32:15, July 10, 2012 CET | From | Union for Victory | To | Debating the Call for early elections, February 3332 |
| Message | The National Republicrats have abused their power. They have not put anything before the legislature in years, and neither have they voted on anything for years until now. The people need a government that wishes to legislate in their interests, not one that does nothing and then suddenly feels it can radically reform the country. |
| Date | 20:10:38, July 10, 2012 CET | From | National Republicrats | To | Debating the Call for early elections, February 3332 |
| Message | If you would please, we have placed laws before the legislature. Check upon your facts before opening your mouth. And the people need a government that adheres to the normal legislative timeline of 72 months, why confuse and disenfranchise the people who you swear to be speaking for? |
| Date | 20:13:53, July 10, 2012 CET | From | Union for Victory | To | Debating the Call for early elections, February 3332 |
| Message | You've contacted us and accused us of not being representative of the people and claiming that we're undemocratic, and now you speak in favour of a term length of 72 months? Another absurdity is that in your party description it clearly states: 'Let us all join together, and have fair elections. Elections where not only one party controls the fate of everyone, but where everyone controls the fate of our parties.' So why don't we join together and have the first fair and competitive elections in years? Currently, one party controls the fate of everyone. Your party. But your party's description says it is against that, so prove it and hold early elections. What have you got to lose? |
| Date | 20:18:51, July 10, 2012 CET | From | House of Varrato | To | Debating the Call for early elections, February 3332 |
| Message | January 3333 is far away |
| Date | 00:56:48, July 11, 2012 CET | From | National Republicrats | To | Debating the Call for early elections, February 3332 |
| Message | Like I said, we need to have a set length of elections; let's not shorten it now, let's keep it the same. Then after the elections, let's introduce electoral reform. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 732 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 18 |
| Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner. |
| Random quote: "Wherever you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship." - Harry S. Truman |