We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Governmental Stability Act (3362)
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Badara - Queranzist Brotherhood
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3363
Description[?]:
For more than a decade our parliament has been plagued by endless attempts to form governments. The organizations primarily responsible not only are admitted terrorists, but also consistently lack the needed votes to form governments. Despite this fact, they continue to make proposals and clog the floor of parliament. Restrictions must be made on the proposals of government coalitions. As long as the opposition can hog the floor of parliament with endless cabinet discussions, our government cannot be fully stable. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Only the largest party can propose a cabinet.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:25:49, September 09, 2012 CET | From | Democratic Union Party | To | Debating the Governmental Stability Act (3362) |
Message | STABILITY is the KEY for ALL AL BADARIANS and IMPROVING EVERYONES LIVES. We the DEMOCRATIC UNION PARTY (DUP) back the measure and hope ALL parties will. |
Date | 00:00:40, September 10, 2012 CET | From | Freedom | To | Debating the Governmental Stability Act (3362) |
Message | We support this bill, we would also like to add that if the biggest party cannot form a government new elections are called or a caretaker government must be appointed. |
Date | 00:13:42, September 10, 2012 CET | From | Al Jabha al-Queranzīa Badariyā | To | Debating the Governmental Stability Act (3362) |
Message | Even it pass or not Still Royal will vote no when a largest party propose a cabinet |
Date | 00:15:50, September 10, 2012 CET | From | United Badara - Queranzist Brotherhood | To | Debating the Governmental Stability Act (3362) |
Message | Right now, the FBA votes no when the largest party proposes a cabinet. What difference does it make if the Vanguards vote no when they're not the largest. Its what you are doing. |
Date | 03:11:01, September 10, 2012 CET | From | Red Vanguard Dominion | To | Debating the Governmental Stability Act (3362) |
Message | The Society will not simply vote "no" unless it is entirely left out, much like the FBA always has. One should remember how The Society proposed no cabinets in its history which had it as Head of Government. The FBA always demands this position. We have offered compromise. Gosh, it was only a few months ago, FBA that we offered and were rejected by Freedom with this bill: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=357947 YOU EVEN SAID: Full support for this cabinet who Express the Badaran Street we appreciate Society for that move and wish more good Bills like those. And then Freedom said no. And you became a terrorist. YOU AREN'T MAKING YOURSELF VERY POPULAR |
Date | 18:37:33, September 10, 2012 CET | From | Freedom | To | Debating the Governmental Stability Act (3362) |
Message | If your serious about reform and peace vote for the FBA's bill which includes this measure. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 313 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 305 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 82 |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
Random quote: "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." - George W. Bush |