We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Supreme Justice Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Al Jabha al-Queranzīa Badariyā
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3366
Description[?]:
In Order to achieve Justice in Badara and remove the dictatorship of Royal red and their Control on the Country Foundations- |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There is a uniform system of courts across the nation.
Current: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Proposed: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Parliamentary privilege.
Old value:: Members of the legislature are exempted from any civil or criminal liability for their speech or actions related with the performance of their duties during their term of office.
Current: Members of the legislature are exempted from any civil or criminal liability for their speech or actions, but this immunity can be overruled by a vote in the nation's legislative body.
Proposed: Members of the legislature are exempted from any civil or criminal liability for their speech or actions, but this immunity can be overruled by a vote in the nation's legislative body.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the organization of police/law enforcement
Old value:: There is a national police department, funded by the government.
Current: There is a national police department, funded by the government.
Proposed: There is a national police department funded by the national government and there are local police departments, funded by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:42:22, September 15, 2012 CET | From | Red Vanguard Dominion | To | Debating the Supreme Justice Act |
Message | YOU CONTINUOUSLY MENTION The "dictatorship" of my party. Yet not a single one of my bills has passed, whilst everything the FBA or Freedom have proposed has passed. YOU BOTH Outlawed homosexual adoption. YOU BOTH Introduced privatized banking. YOU BOTH Allowed workers to be fired without reasonable reasons. YOU BOTH Removed the ability for any drug, at all, to be used by absolutely anyone. YOU BOTH Have passed every single bill you both vote in tandem on. SO I FAIL To see the dictatorship. BUT PLEASE Whatever makes your terrorist army seem more sympathetic, feel free to lie about. |
Date | 22:28:34, September 16, 2012 CET | From | United Justice Party | To | Debating the Supreme Justice Act |
Message | THERE IS NOUGHT But the State! Therefore, we cannot let 'local governments' and the myth of self-determination get into the way of the administration of law! And an appeal? We will not allow the State's time to be wasted on whingy criminals who will not submit to the State's almighty judgement. THE STATE IS All-consuming. It must be able to crack down with an iron fist. Local governments will only interfere with this process. THEREFORE We vote no. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 194 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 500 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 6 |
Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time. |
Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader |