We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Safety Protection Act 2151
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Democrat Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2154
Description[?]:
| Initiates laws, in particular relation to guns for the protection of the Vanuku people |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapon concealment.
Old value:: Any legal weapon may be concealed when carried.
Current: Where weapons are carried, this must be done openly.
Proposed: People must first obtain a permit in order to carry concealed weapons.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, but these may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:32:56, December 09, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Public Safety Protection Act 2151 |
| Message | The DSP disagrees with article II. This is restrictive to people's civil liberties. The rest is all good. |
| Date | 11:14:07, December 09, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Democrat Party | To | Debating the Public Safety Protection Act 2151 |
| Message | This isnt that restricitve, its allowing people who actually need them to have them, for example sports people, farmers, security officers, and it prevent people from owner such a deadly weapon unnessicarily. Would should anyone need one anyway. This option people still have to apply for the weapon as to protect the public from people who dont need them |
| Date | 19:33:02, December 09, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Public Safety Protection Act 2151 |
| Message | People who want to have one to feel safe or have fun hunting might want one. Your resticting those rights. |
| Date | 20:36:30, December 09, 2005 CET | From | Pragmatic Symphony Party | To | Debating the Public Safety Protection Act 2151 |
| Message | Agree with DSP. |
| Date | 10:54:32, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Democrat Party | To | Debating the Public Safety Protection Act 2151 |
| Message | Article II has been removed |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 331 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 197 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation. |
| Random quote: "Voting Tory will cause your wife to have bigger breasts and increase your chances of owning a BMW M3." - Boris Johnson |