We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economics
Details
Submitted by[?]: Solistev House
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3375
Description[?]:
| Economic possibilities to change |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Embargo on Solentia.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy provision is left to local governments.
Current: Energy is provided by nationalised companies.
Proposed: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on minimum wage regulation.
Old value:: There is no provision for a minimum wage.
Current: There shall be a minimum wage at a level that a single full time worker on it can adequately subsist.
Proposed: There shall be a minimum wage at a level that a single full time worker on it can adequately subsist.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:36:41, October 03, 2012 CET | From |  Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Economics |
| Message | Are you aware of the conflict we have with Solentia? http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=356829 Get them to apologise and call of their embargo on us, then we will call of our embargo on them. Apparently, you're happy that the Solentian government spreads lies about Beluzia and constantly disrespects our customs. |
| Date | 03:57:33, October 03, 2012 CET | From | United Socialist Workers Party | To | Debating the Economics |
| Message | Both sides must negotiate together,not throw all their mandates at a wall and hope they stick. Both sides will have to take some cuts for peace to be reached.This is how freedom works my sir. |
| Date | 04:05:14, October 03, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Economics |
| Message | Do not dare to tell the High Count what he "must" do. We don't need Solentia. They have been given enough chances. Before blabbing about what you remain ignorant of, I suggest you review the details of the actual conflict: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=356829 When you're aware of the actual situation, then you may assume the right to comment on it. -- Allan Robinson, Foreign Minister |
| Date | 05:08:20, October 03, 2012 CET | From | United Socialist Workers Party | To | Debating the Economics |
| Message | What is in the past is not what i focus on. I focus on the future and how bright it is if negotiations resume. I have no respect for the High Count or his dynasty. I am here for change and you will not tell me what i can and cant say,that is my decision because i am free and i am a person who along with his party spread new change. Your dynasty days are coming to an end,and new,democratic days where there is a president are on the horizon "High Count" |
| Date | 13:47:46, October 03, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Economics |
| Message | That's funny, because: 1) The High Count is the Speaker of the Legislature. 2) You do not have a seat or a government position, so you shouldn't be in the legislature. 3) The High Count only allows you to speak in the legislature, out of his mercy and pity for you. Please escort yourself out. -- Allan Robinson, Foreign Minister |
| Date | 23:26:56, October 03, 2012 CET | From | United Socialist Workers Party | To | Debating the Economics |
| Message | Soon i will have a majority in the legislature and all of you talk wiil be for nothing because there will be a socialist governmemt, not a oligarchy. It only takes time. |
| Date | 00:07:04, October 04, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Economics |
| Message | The oligarchy is not a part of the government... I am a civilian cabinet minister, and I'm a Socialist, not an oligarch. The oligarchy controls the legislature. The government is controlled by civilian parties, including the Liberal Socialist Party, of which I'm a member. -- Allan Robinson, Foreign Minister |
| Date | 02:26:57, October 04, 2012 CET | From | United Socialist Workers Party | To | Debating the Economics |
| Message | Soon there will be no oligarchy. |
| Date | 03:13:24, October 04, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Economics |
| Message | There will always be oligarchy. Whenever there is a set of people ruling together, oligarchy will prevail, even if we are not the oligarchs in it. If your party has control of 100% of the legislature, your party is the oligarchy. In Beluzia, now, we have an oligarchy that comprises of multiple houses, each with their own independent policies and views. You should be lucky you're not in a monarchy where the monarch's house dominates all, and leaves no room for others to enter the political scene. And don't try to threaten the monarch. He controls a large army, and they wouldn't mind using you for target practice. -- Allan Robinson, Foreign Minister |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 28 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 49 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 22 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson |