We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Judicial Efficiency Act of 3376
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Badara - Queranzist Brotherhood
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3377
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There is a uniform system of courts across the nation.
Current: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Proposed: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:40:47, October 07, 2012 CET | From |  United Justice Party | To | Debating the Judicial Efficiency Act of 3376 |
| Message | Al Badara is very much a unitary nation, and local governments have close to no power. Thus, regional courts are merely there to spend valuable government funds. There is no sense in spending on the upkeep of courts if they have jurisdiction over little more than fishing quotas. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 98 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 292 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 310 |
| Random fact: When elections in a country are held, all bills in the voting phase are reset to the debate phase. |
| Random quote: "Democrats couldn't care less if people in Indiana hate them. But if Europeans curl their lips, liberals can't look at themselves in the mirror." - Ann Coulter |