We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Union of Majatran Nations
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3464
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Union of Majatran Nations. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Union of Majatran Nations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:47:46, January 16, 2013 CET | From | Ḥizb al-Lībirālī al-Qafuri | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union of Majatran Nations |
| Message | Kafuristan can confirm it shall be joining and urges the same of you, in the name of peace and democracy. |
| Date | 17:07:39, January 18, 2013 CET | From | Popolari per l'Istalia - U.o.L. | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union of Majatran Nations |
| Message | We urge the Imperium Selucianum to sign this treaty. It will ensure the political and economic union of all the States Majatra and allow us to establish common policies for peace and growth. signed, Gian Mario Mario (CDN) President of the New Pan-Majatran Union Coalition |
| Date | 20:12:09, January 18, 2013 CET | From | LP | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union of Majatran Nations |
| Message | Lord Fauburg, KLP: Dear house, this treaty is one of the deepest intrusion of our national souvereignty ever. Me, and many other member of this senate have repeatedly warned and questioned the influence of that treaty on our foreign and immigration policy. What, for example happens to the NFC or to the strict immigration law? May I ask the Princeps Seantus, whether he will be king in his own house? And does the Princeps Senatus joining me and my backbench collegues in paying tribute to the fact, that after the signing of this treaty Selucia will be nothing more or less then a small chain of Islands in the Ocean and not a great Empire. |
| Date | 20:19:59, January 18, 2013 CET | From | LP | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union of Majatran Nations |
| Message | Princeps Senatus, KLP, Eberhard Schlee: I take the worries and doubts of my collegues very seriously, however I can assure you, that Selucia would not become a second class state. We will also not giving up our strict immigration policy and the National Foreigner Card will be an obligation for all new immigrants, even if they are from the UMN. We will also impose certain restrictions on labour, goods and services if we should become member, this will also include a transformation period. As I said before, Selucia cannot stand aside and leave such a huge market out of it's reach. |
| Date | 20:21:09, January 18, 2013 CET | From | LP | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union of Majatran Nations |
| Message | Lord Fauburg, KLP: But can he then confirm, that the people will have a say on the entry and if yes, when? |
| Date | 20:22:15, January 18, 2013 CET | From | LP | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union of Majatran Nations |
| Message | As I said before, we will not making this an issue of direct democracy. The people have given us the mandate to govern and we will do so, if there is a majority. Princeps Senatus |
| Date | 20:25:07, January 18, 2013 CET | From | LP | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union of Majatran Nations |
| Message | *form the government benches: but what about the activity of the UNM?* The activtiy of the UNM will be examined and we will give the Senate a detailed explanation as soon as we have examined whether the acitivites of the UNM are sufficent. |
| Date | 18:03:17, March 26, 2013 CET | From | LP | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union of Majatran Nations |
| Message | Result to the question: Should Selucia join the UNM? Tournout: 73,12% or 54.666.247 Yes: 41,27% or 22.560.760 No: 58,73% or 32.105.487 |
| Date | 15:36:35, April 02, 2013 CET | From | LP | To | Debating the Ratification of the Union of Majatran Nations |
| Message | Dear ladies and gentelmen, the KLP is neither in the position nor has it the moral authority to speak against a clearly expressed public opinion. We want a closer scrutiny of that treaty, before we can agree on joining it. Gerald Nied, leader of the KLP fraction |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes |
Total Seats: 335 | |
| no |
Total Seats: 310 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset. |
| Random quote: "Real politics is the possession and distribution of power." - Benjamin Disraeli |