Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5475
Next month in: 00:57:39
Server time: 03:02:20, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 3430

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:18:57, January 23, 2013 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party of Vorona (SLP)
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageWhat are you doing, seriously?

Date13:23:01, January 23, 2013 CET
From People's Party
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageWe're cutting bureaucracy and creating a constitution which will cover many of the areas covered by treaties.

Date13:24:37, January 23, 2013 CET
From People's Party
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageThe constitution can be found here: http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=2387

Date13:25:43, January 23, 2013 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party of Vorona (SLP)
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageAnd so it is your terms once again; we won't be able to change the "constitution" without your permission

Date13:28:08, January 23, 2013 CET
From People's Party
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageIts not my terms, they're very reasonable articles with fairness and civil liberties at the heart of them. Many of them also have multiple options. It simply prevents tyrannical regimes seizing power in Vorona and ensures that the people cannot be oppressed.

Date13:31:32, January 23, 2013 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party of Vorona (SLP)
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageYour articles in the constitutional reform bill also reeks of tyrants. Only heads of state can propose cabinets? Seriously?

Date13:33:45, January 23, 2013 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party of Vorona (SLP)
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageYour articles in the constitutional reform bill also reeks of tyrants. Only heads of state can propose cabinets? Seriously?

Date13:34:20, January 23, 2013 CET
From People's Party
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageThat system is the traditional political system of Vorona. I don't see an unfairness in that. It would be pointless in electing a head of state that has no powers.

Date13:42:42, January 23, 2013 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party of Vorona (SLP)
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageThe traditional political system in Vorona, I repeat, is a monarchy. A cabinet should be determined by the largest party or a coalition of small parties, who are able to form a majority or plurality in government. The head of state may not be from that party or parties. This article will be flawed.

Date13:44:52, January 23, 2013 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party of Vorona (SLP)
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageAnd FYI, the purpose of international treaties is to ensure an international world order an a peaceful global system. You cannot just withdraw from them to "remove bureaucracy".

Date13:49:10, January 23, 2013 CET
From People's Party
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageThen what exactly is the point of having an elected head of state if the position has no power? It is pointless. Usually the winner of the head of state election is also the winner of the legislative election too so I see no reason why this is causing great concern. Our reasoning behind this proposal, as we have explained, is to give meaning to the position of head of state as currently it is powerless. Furthermore, we would hope that in a modern democracy such as Vorona that the head of state would make a fair cabinet proposal anyway.

Regarding treaties, many of those we're proposing to withdraw from have articles that are covered by other treaties that we are signatories of. There is no point being signatories to numerous treaties that cover the same things.

Date14:06:51, January 23, 2013 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party of Vorona (SLP)
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageIn the past few elections of Vorona, the head of state wasn't the winner of the legislative election too. Chec the electoral history. This will happen again if there exist another multi-party system here. Each of the treaties advocate different causes, regardless of whatever their articles are. Please understand that role-playing plays a part here.

Date14:10:48, January 23, 2013 CET
From People's Party
ToDebating the Anti-Bureaucracy Act.3429
MessageThe head of state candidate should be fair enough to propose a fair cabinet that should either include the largest party or a coalition of like minded parties. If you have that much distrust in Voronan politics it is quite a wonder why your party continues to exist..

I repeat: either, there are other treaties that we are already signatories to that cover things that we propose to withdraw from, and the consitution we are proposing will cover the most important areas anyway.

(Yes RP is important, but when you cannot access the forums thats quite tricky)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 239

no
  

Total Seats: 11

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Each user account may only be used by the player who set it up. Handing over an account to another player is not allowed.

    Random quote: "If there's anything a public servant hates to do it's something for the public." - Kin Hubbard

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 54