Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 00:16:34
Server time: 19:43:25, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Grand Packet of Laws and other resolutions

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal-Democratic Party (LDP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3437

Description[?]:

To restore the social policy of golden times, and reform society and its national symbols.
First I want a debate and then advance to the definitively package of laws.

Parliamentary Leader of LDP: Osama Tantawi

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:47:13, February 06, 2013 CET
FromLiberal-Democratic Party (LDP)
ToDebating the Grand Packet of Laws and other resolutions
MessageSmall change in the lyrics of the National Anthem:
from "And protect our King;" to "And protect our citizens;"

Date18:05:29, February 06, 2013 CET
FromḤizb al-Lībirālī al-Qafuri
ToDebating the Grand Packet of Laws and other resolutions
MessageIt needs to be, "we shall protect them" in the next line.

Date18:05:51, February 06, 2013 CET
FromḤizb al-Lībirālī al-Qafuri
ToDebating the Grand Packet of Laws and other resolutions
MessageWe can support Article 1.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 219

no
 

Total Seats: 431

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "Democrats always assure us that deterrence will work, but when the time comes to deter, they're against it. " - Ann Coulter

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 66