We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: LBSC Initiative 47 - Energy DERegulation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2157
Description[?]:
'Scuze me Grammar Nazis... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Proposed: Energy is provided by private, unregulated companies but subsidies are given to those on a low income.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:12:18, December 16, 2005 CET | From | Socialist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the LBSC Initiative 47 - Energy DERegulation |
Message | Prices need to be regulated in a sensible economy. |
Date | 03:15:49, December 16, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the LBSC Initiative 47 - Energy DERegulation |
Message | Urmm.....isn't the current one more better, since the tax payer dont have to pay for other peoples energy |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 71 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 116 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 14 |
Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician |