We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: SCI Civil Freedoms in a Modern Society
Details
Submitted by[?]: SCI Libertarian-Socialist Syndicate (LL)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3481
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to adultery.
Old value:: There is no explicit government policy on adultery.
Current: There is no explicit government policy on adultery.
Proposed: Adultery is legal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: Public nudity is illegal and prosecuted as a civil offence.
Current: Public nudity is illegal and prosecuted as a civil offence.
Proposed: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Current: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Proposed: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:01:24, May 05, 2013 CET | From | Conservative Party of Ikradon | To | Debating the SCI Civil Freedoms in a Modern Society |
| Message | We don't see why the state has to endorse people cheating on their husbands or wives, that's quite absurd. Again, we don't see why people should be allowed to expose their genitals and flab to the public when many people find it grotesque. Plus, we don't see why people should have to witness people having sex in public like animals. |
| Date | 13:44:23, May 05, 2013 CET | From | SCI Libertarian-Socialist Syndicate (LL) | To | Debating the SCI Civil Freedoms in a Modern Society |
| Message | Allowing it to happen and endorsing it are not the same. Because we are human beings and our natural bodies should not be criminalized. Again, this is a natural act, and a fun one at that. This had been law for hundreds of years in Ikradon, we do not have the same sexual modesty as other societies. |
| Date | 14:52:18, May 05, 2013 CET | From | Green-Left Communalist Collective | To | Debating the SCI Civil Freedoms in a Modern Society |
| Message | The Worker's Daily - Headline: AnPerSyn politician attends Presidium stark naked in 'propaganda of the deed' protest. |
| Date | 17:55:40, May 05, 2013 CET | From | Democratic Communist Party (DCP) (LL) | To | Debating the SCI Civil Freedoms in a Modern Society |
| Message | There is actually some evidence that relationships in which the partners have sex with other people occasionally are more likely to be successful than strictly sexually monogamous ones. Plus, I have to say, you seems to have a big problem with adultery, but no problem with polygamy, which is also legal in Ikradon. Odd. |
| Date | 18:52:50, May 05, 2013 CET | From | Conservative Party of Ikradon | To | Debating the SCI Civil Freedoms in a Modern Society |
| Message | If the state says that its legal you could say its the state endorsing it. Its definitely not the state telling people not to do it. |
| Date | 08:01:29, May 06, 2013 CET | From | Democratic Communist Party (DCP) (LL) | To | Debating the SCI Civil Freedoms in a Modern Society |
| Message | So, by that logic this government promotes: Drug Use Polygamy Abortion Drinking Assisted Suicide Chemical Use in Agriculture Tobacco Use Advertising Stock Trading Gambling Pornography Prostitution Gated Communities Lawsuits Home Schooling Private Schools Violent Video Games Cloning Pet Ownership Gun Ownership Crossdressing Divorce Desecration of the flag People having tons of kids Blasphemy Missionary Work Your argument is absurd |
| Date | 10:40:58, May 06, 2013 CET | From | Conservative Party of Ikradon | To | Debating the SCI Civil Freedoms in a Modern Society |
| Message | It's not 'absurd', in the cases you've indicated it could also be true. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 257 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 410 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 63 |
| Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
| Random quote: "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson |