Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5475
Next month in: 01:14:22
Server time: 02:45:37, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Protect Domestic Investors Clause of 3483

Details

Submitted by[?]: Phillipsian Party of Ikradon

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3484

Description[?]:

We in the Phillipsian Party belive in isolationism in economics. As a means to protect Ikradon's investors, foreign entities should not have a majority share in any company.
-Joe Phillips, Former President of Ikradon and Leader of the Phillipsian Party

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:29:09, May 11, 2013 CET
From Green-Left Communalist Collective
ToDebating the Protect Domestic Investors Clause of 3483
MessageWe strongly support. We believe that foreign investors may influence national enterprises in a capitalist direction.

Date18:52:24, May 11, 2013 CET
From PDP (Pro Dictatorship Party)
ToDebating the Protect Domestic Investors Clause of 3483
MessageIf more money flows out of the country then in, naturaly things will end horribly. Therefore the PDP find this bill useful in the protection of investors and keeps the country safe and happy.

Date22:14:51, May 11, 2013 CET
From SCI Libertarian-Socialist Syndicate (LL)
ToDebating the Protect Domestic Investors Clause of 3483
MessageAs long as we have Democratic Workers' Councils, no one should worry about foreign investment because, as opposed to a capitalist ownership mentality, investment does not equal ownership. The workers will all still be fully in control of the company and no profits will be lost.

I envision Ikradonian Foreign Investment simply as a loan mechanism. The company in question receives "investment" from a foreign entity and the money is used for capital outlays on expansion of production (or whatever) and a pre-agreed interest or set price is, at some point, returned to the investor. No ownership is exchanged because no one but the workers can have ownership of the company.

Date02:13:44, May 12, 2013 CET
From Green-Left Communalist Collective
ToDebating the Protect Domestic Investors Clause of 3483
MessageWe sympathise with the SCI and understand their view that the DWCs fundamental to Ikradon's economy radically alter the socio-economic mentality of workers planning collectively and individually. However, the majority of our members, many being protectionists opposed to the the use of capital for funding environmental destruction, have decided to vote in favour of this bill.

Date02:14:44, May 12, 2013 CET
From Green-Left Communalist Collective
ToDebating the Protect Domestic Investors Clause of 3483
Message* "...opposed to the the use of capital abroad for funding environmental destruction...."

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 502

no
 

Total Seats: 181

abstain
  

Total Seats: 67


Random fact: Once approved, players should copy Cultural Protocols into a bill in the debate section of their nation page, under the title of "OOC: Cultural Protocols". This bill should include links to the passed Cultural Protocol bill and the Moderation approval.

Random quote: "Real politics is the possession and distribution of power." - Benjamin Disraeli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56