We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economic Security and Regulation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Fascist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3545
Description[?]:
Mr Speaker, The people have spoken. The NFP ran on a platform of economic regulation and we are now the largest party. We call for new economic regulation to protect our workers. Silas Orkard, Parliamentary Leader |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Dranish Free Trade and Mutual Friendship Pact.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private, unregulated companies but subsidies are given to those on a low income.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Proposed: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The right to gamble.
Old value:: Gambling is legal across the nation, no regulation whatsoever.
Current: Gambling is legal, but only in private homes and casinos with special licences.
Proposed: The legality of gambling is a matter of local governments.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning phone services.
Old value:: The state subsidizes the phone service of low income families but does not regulate the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Current: The state regulates the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Proposed: The state regulates the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the stock exchange(s).
Old value:: Stock exchanges are allowed and are unregulated.
Current: Stock exchanges are allowed but are regulated.
Proposed: Stock exchanges are allowed but are regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:55:35, September 12, 2013 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Economic Security and Regulation Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, indeed the people have spoken, and delivered a majority to those parties in favor of the free market. The fascists seem not to have done the electoral math, because if they did they'd know that the people rejected economic interventionism. Erin Woodward MP Member for Elbian Minister of Trade and Industry |
Date | 03:39:04, September 13, 2013 CET | From | National Fascist Party | To | Debating the Economic Security and Regulation Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, If the people rejected us how did we manage to win a plurality of seats? The fact is people are tired of the RFR led corporate dominance where even basic services are whored out to corporations to fatten their bottom lines at the expense of hard working Dranish persons. We are the only party actively promoting a fair, and prosperous economy that benefits Dranes and isn't under the control of multi-national corporations or a government that for all intents and purposes is owned by corporations. Silas Orkard Parliamentary Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 182 | |||
no | Total Seats: 132 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 85 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." - Barry Goldwater |