We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal Rights Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party of Darnussia
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2160
Description[?]:
| Why should Animals be tortured for Profit? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Current: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Proposed: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:26:42, December 22, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
| Message | Tortured. Nice. |
| Date | 15:50:42, December 22, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
| Message | Because without animal testing, we'd be nowhere. |
| Date | 16:40:12, December 22, 2005 CET | From | Darnussian Strength Initiative | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
| Message | Because I don't want my hair spray to melt the skin off of my scalp. |
| Date | 18:55:35, December 22, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
| Message | CED, what you mean? It is comestic testing, as in shampoo and stuff |
| Date | 18:59:32, December 22, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
| Message | I am not against animal testing outright, only for comestic products, medical testing is fine, since it benifits society, comestic testing only benifits capitalists |
| Date | 19:00:05, December 22, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
| Message | The rich companies, when there are other options for them to test effectively |
| Date | 22:02:10, December 22, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
| Message | testing for scientific purposes is one thing but testing for cosmetics? Isn't that a bit unnecessary? |
| Date | 00:39:30, December 23, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
| Message | You'd rather try it out on humans? |
| Date | 01:11:14, December 23, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act |
| Message | Why not? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 291 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 259 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset. |
| Random quote: "It is said, 'Pontesi is Jelbic in nature'. But I tell you, they are really a lost tribe of Selucians, forced to become barbarians by their savage Jelbic conquerors." - Alamar Xarfaxis, former Pontesian politician |