We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Zardic Dundorf Relations Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Zardio Federisma Partio
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3598
Description[?]:
| As per the terms of this treaty: 600 military advisors will be deployed to Dundorf to conduct and work on joint training exercises 8,000 regular Zardic soldiers will be deployed to Dundorf no later than 6 months after the ratification of this treaty, a further 12,000 will be deplopyed no later than 1 year after the 8000 arrive 35 fighter jets and relevent support aircraft and personal will be deployed Zardugal will open the Kostandian Bay Joint Operations Base which will house the Dundorfian mission to Zardugal and its contingent. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Zardic-Dundorfian Treaty of Friendship, Co-Operation and Mutual Security.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:46:41, December 26, 2013 CET | From | Communist Kalvere Independence Movement | To | Debating the Zardic Dundorf Relations Act |
| Message | Dont see why we would. It doesnt affect us. |
| Date | 23:17:35, December 26, 2013 CET | From | Zardio Federisma Partio | To | Debating the Zardic Dundorf Relations Act |
| Message | Madame Speaker, Dundorf for the past several decades has been one of our staunchest allies. Together, Dundorf, Cobura and Solentia are the best allies Zardugal has and we have a duty to stand with our allies and work with them. This will further ties with an important and reliable ally. Amanda Vesper Foreign Minister |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 685 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 65 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Under every stone lurks a politician." Aristophanes (450 BC - 388 BC), Thesmophoriazusae, 410 B.C |