We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2161
Details
Submitted by[?]: Darnussian Strength Initiative
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2161
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the Staatspräsident/President (President) chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Social Democratic Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Social Democratic Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Chinkopodian Economic Democrats
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Chinkopodian Economic Democrats
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Vuloch Ca Korzia
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Progressive Democratic Alliance
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Darnussian Strength Initiative
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Darnussian Strength Initiative
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Social Democratic Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Chinkopodian Economic Democrats
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Chinkopodian Economic Democrats
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Social Democratic Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:09:59, December 25, 2005 CET | From | Darnussian Strength Initiative | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161 |
| Message | This is as inclusive as I will propose of a cabinet. While we do agree that the war effort should represent a unified nation, the domestic policy making shall remain largely the same. |
| Date | 05:42:23, December 25, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161 |
| Message | Truly, our only problem with this new cabinet proposal is the proposed Forgein Minister. I mean, I really don't know how I can trust our international relationships on this party. This is another party that seeks to blow off all our money on third-world nations (All the bills proposed to take us out of the Refugee Rights Treaty and the bills proposed to cut down on spending to third-world nations). I understand Internal Affairs, though I am not 100% pleased with the addition of a 4th party. But this 5th party proposed for Forgein Affairs? |
| Date | 05:43:09, December 25, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161 |
| Message | I think we all understand how vital to the nation the Foreign Minister is. |
| Date | 06:11:26, December 25, 2005 CET | From | Darnussian Strength Initiative | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161 |
| Message | Voluch ca Korzia has shown his resolve to fight for the sovereignty of nations world wide with his support of the Darnussian defense of Kalistan. His actions with regards to foreign aid will be bound by the approval of the Legislation, the HoG, and the Finance Minister, all of which are controlled by the CAD and the LBSC. Moreover, this is merely an attempt at bridging political differences in a time of war. |
| Date | 13:01:03, December 25, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161 |
| Message | If you give Education and Health to NLA, I may consider to recast my vote, |
| Date | 17:38:23, December 25, 2005 CET | From | Darnussian Strength Initiative | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161 |
| Message | I am only offering as an attempt to unify the government behind the war effort, and, although I do respect the NLA, their party is ideologically opposed to the current legislation voted forward by the Senate. Such a strong conflict of interest could not serve well within the Cabinet. |
| Date | 17:40:50, December 25, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161 |
| Message | After further consideration, we've decided to recast our vote considering that we retain the position of HoG, as stated in this bill, so that we can be assured that VCK does not cause any problems as Forgein Minister. |
| Date | 19:48:46, December 25, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161 |
| Message | What legislation is it that we are ideologically opposed to the Corporate Assembly on? |
| Date | 04:57:15, December 26, 2005 CET | From | Darnussian Strength Initiative | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161 |
| Message | Thank you LBSC, NLA: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=39675 http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=39682 That is why I am not handing over healthcare or education. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 424 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 51 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 75 |
| Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game. |
| Random quote: "The first step in freeing yourself from social restrictions is the realization that there is no such thing as a 'safe' code of conduct, one that would earn everyone's approval. Your actions can always be condemned by someone, for being too bold or too apathetic, for being too conformist or too nonconformist, for being too liberal or too conservative. So it's necessary to decide whose approval is important to you." - Harry Browne |