Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:59:33
Server time: 19:00:26, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ImperialLodamun | Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2161

Details

Submitted by[?]: Darnussian Strength Initiative

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2161

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:09:59, December 25, 2005 CET
FromDarnussian Strength Initiative
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161
MessageThis is as inclusive as I will propose of a cabinet.

While we do agree that the war effort should represent a unified nation, the domestic policy making shall remain largely the same.

Date05:42:23, December 25, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161
MessageTruly, our only problem with this new cabinet proposal is the proposed Forgein Minister. I mean, I really don't know how I can trust our international relationships on this party. This is another party that seeks to blow off all our money on third-world nations (All the bills proposed to take us out of the Refugee Rights Treaty and the bills proposed to cut down on spending to third-world nations).

I understand Internal Affairs, though I am not 100% pleased with the addition of a 4th party. But this 5th party proposed for Forgein Affairs?

Date05:43:09, December 25, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161
MessageI think we all understand how vital to the nation the Foreign Minister is.

Date06:11:26, December 25, 2005 CET
FromDarnussian Strength Initiative
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161
MessageVoluch ca Korzia has shown his resolve to fight for the sovereignty of nations world wide with his support of the Darnussian defense of Kalistan. His actions with regards to foreign aid will be bound by the approval of the Legislation, the HoG, and the Finance Minister, all of which are controlled by the CAD and the LBSC.

Moreover, this is merely an attempt at bridging political differences in a time of war.

Date13:01:03, December 25, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161
MessageIf you give Education and Health to NLA, I may consider to recast my vote,

Date17:38:23, December 25, 2005 CET
FromDarnussian Strength Initiative
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161
MessageI am only offering as an attempt to unify the government behind the war effort, and, although I do respect the NLA, their party is ideologically opposed to the current legislation voted forward by the Senate. Such a strong conflict of interest could not serve well within the Cabinet.


Date17:40:50, December 25, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161
MessageAfter further consideration, we've decided to recast our vote considering that we retain the position of HoG, as stated in this bill, so that we can be assured that VCK does not cause any problems as Forgein Minister.

Date19:48:46, December 25, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Democratic Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161
MessageWhat legislation is it that we are ideologically opposed to the Corporate Assembly on?

Date04:57:15, December 26, 2005 CET
FromDarnussian Strength Initiative
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2161
MessageThank you LBSC,

NLA:

http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=39675
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=39682

That is why I am not handing over healthcare or education.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 424

no
 

Total Seats: 51

abstain
  

Total Seats: 75


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "The basis of a democratic state is liberty." - Aristotle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70