We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Fair Shake Reforms 1
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative People's Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3610
Description[?]:
(To facilitate passing this bill it shall be broken into multiple parts.) Realizing that the paths to economic prosperity should include as few roadblocks as possible. Declaring that the government has no place in favoring one path over the others, so long as these paths do not steer followers into crime. Believing that all citizens should be able to compete regardless of outside factors. Realizing that while wealth and poverty can both lead to ruin, individuals must be in control of their own fates. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for any reason.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on Democratic Workers' Councils.
Old value:: The government requires all businesses to be run by Democratic Workers' Councils.
Current: The government does not intervene in the marketplace with regards to Democratic Workers' Councils.
Proposed: The government does not intervene in the marketplace with regards to Democratic Workers' Councils.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:45:51, January 19, 2014 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the The Fair Shake Reforms 1 |
Message | Mr Speaker We would support Articles 1 and 3 but would urge a compromise provision for Article 2. Rose Worthington MP, United Party leader |
Date | 22:50:29, January 19, 2014 CET | From | Democratic Party of Hutori | To | Debating the The Fair Shake Reforms 1 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The Democratic Party of Hutori would support Articles 1 and 2, but will not support this legislation if Article 3 remains. Jordan Eldridge, MP, Democratic Party Leader |
Date | 22:59:43, January 19, 2014 CET | From | Democratic Party of Hutori | To | Debating the The Fair Shake Reforms 1 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The Democratic Party urges the Shed Party to compromise first by separating Article 1 from this legislation so we can pass the changes, while we continue to work on Articles 2 and 3. Jordan Eldridge, MP, Democratic Party Leader |
Date | 23:05:22, January 19, 2014 CET | From | Democratic Party of Hutori | To | Debating the The Fair Shake Reforms 1 |
Message | I apologize Mr. Speaker, The Articles above, for some odd reason, changed and thus my explanation on my above debate needs clarification. The Democratic Party agrees with the change in the Government's policy regarding Democratic Workers' Councils and Eminent Domain, however can not support the Government's changes to making only open shops legal in this great Republic. The Democratic Party, while against communism, is against any measure that would negatively effect worker's rights in this Republic. While the Democratic Party is not against profit making companies and individuals, they should never do it on the backs of our hard working constituents. Jordan Eldridge, MP, Democratic Party Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 299 | |||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 236 |
Random fact: Zardugal is a nation based on the old Byzantine Empire, with a modern twist and the Esperanto language. Zardugal is located on the continent of Majatra. |
Random quote: "Racism isn't born, folks; it's taught. I have a two-year-old son. You know what he hates? Naps! End of list." - Dennis Leary |