Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 00:31:33
Server time: 03:28:26, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mandarin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Increase Military Size

Details

Submitted by[?]: Majataran Capitalist Resurrection Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2162

Description[?]:

As Tensions are on the Rise We propose to Increase the Size of the Total Military by 25% by Means of Conscription. This Will serve as a deterent to Axis agression and any form of agression by our neighbors.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:29:10, December 27, 2005 CET
FromIshtirakiya Party
ToDebating the Increase Military Size
MessageThe war is over! increasing our millitary right now is not the best option

Date00:23:33, December 28, 2005 CET
FromMajataran Capitalist Resurrection Party
ToDebating the Increase Military Size
Messagetensions are High. We must Prepare for any agression. If we have learned anything from history its that Big Wars Lead to Even Bigger ones. We Must be prepared for any form of attack.

Date00:35:55, December 28, 2005 CET
FromMajatran Socialist Party
ToDebating the Increase Military Size
MessageWe wish to alert everyones attention to the situation in Deltaria. The new democratic government is being invaded by the forces of tyranny who wish to send Deltaria back to the past. We must intervene, for the future of Majatra.

Date01:16:10, December 28, 2005 CET
FromMajataran Capitalist Resurrection Party
ToDebating the Increase Military Size
MessageThis is the Begining of the Bigger War I spoke of.

Date02:56:03, December 28, 2005 CET
FromIshtirakiya Party
ToDebating the Increase Military Size
MessageWell in that case, perhapse the bill should be re-written to include said proposal, since this bill has none attached

OOC: there is a proposal to instate a draft or something along those lines, isn't there?

Date16:25:34, December 28, 2005 CET
FromUnion of Progressive Ulama
ToDebating the Increase Military Size
Messageooc: yes there is. It has been controversail in the past (UPU opposed it with civil disobedidence, the Patriots, then in government, attacked anti-conscription protesters.)

The money to fund a larger defence budget was already approved. Increasing the size of our forces is now affordable, and so we can see no reason to oppose this bill. We assume the navy will remain our strongest service?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 494

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
        

    Total Seats: 256


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

    Random quote: "The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workers of all countries: unite!" - Karl Marx

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 57