Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 00:41:56
Server time: 15:18:03, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Bill - Proposal to the Presidium

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Liberal Association

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 3636

Description[?]:

We support a stronger military, in order to defend ourselves from possible invaders. Please consider these proposals.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:00:31, March 14, 2014 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the Military Bill - Proposal to the Presidium
MessageMr. Speaker,

This allows the snobs in the upper class to pay their way out of experiencing the great feeling of service and community. It teaches them to pay their way out of life, and that being wealthy allows them to be given special treatment.

--

Rolf Orman,
Chairman of the NRG,
Vice President of Lodamun

Date17:13:53, March 14, 2014 CET
FromGrand Nationalist Fraction
ToDebating the Military Bill - Proposal to the Presidium
MessageMr. Speaker,

we oppose to the second article.
We refuse to even think about the first one...

Anton Spinoy
Minister of Defence

Date22:08:31, March 14, 2014 CET
FromSocial Anarchist Party
ToDebating the Military Bill - Proposal to the Presidium
MessageMr. Speaker,

Both articles are ludicrous and we refuse to support this madness. Not only will the upper class feel they can pay their way through life- it will also lower their moral and loyalty to the country.


Evard Brown,
Minister of Internal Affairs

Date19:07:20, March 15, 2014 CET
FromAllied Humanists
ToDebating the Military Bill - Proposal to the Presidium
MessageWe opt to support the second article of this bill rather than the first as we agree with our great dictators of the NRG (to some extent).

Arceus Plato
Justice Correspondent

Date23:59:27, March 15, 2014 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the Military Bill - Proposal to the Presidium
MessageMr. Speaker,

It is sad that the Allied Humanists would want to leave it up to the military to have the free will to put landmines anywhere. This is dangerous. Wanting to restrict the military for the sake of the people is far from being a party of dictators.

--

Motya Bogomolov,
NRG Spokesman on Defence

Date16:37:38, March 16, 2014 CET
FromAllied Humanists
ToDebating the Military Bill - Proposal to the Presidium
MessageI do believe this matter was brought up some time ago where we declared that such an allowance would come with restrictions as to the areas in which they can be used. (Revised Military Act 3610)

Stella Steel
Defence Correspondent

Date17:47:50, March 16, 2014 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the Military Bill - Proposal to the Presidium
MessageMr. Speaker,

A proposal to make change the law to state "The use of land mines is allowed but restricted" is completely different from the law being proposed in this bill, which allows the military to use landmines at their own free will.

--

Motya Bogomolov,
NRG Spokesman on Defence

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 200

no
   

Total Seats: 399

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663

    Random quote: "We live in a world in which politics has replaced philosophy." - Martin L. Gross

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 68