We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Einheitliches Gesetz für Charterschulen, 3639
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberale Volkspartei
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3640
Description[?]:
| Herr Präsident, in order to establish nationwide standards for education as the Education Minister is currently attempting to do, we should also impose a uniform regulation on charter schools, although it should be noted that the transfer of power from local to national government that comes with it will not increase overall government interference in the sector of education, since this reform will grant charter schools as much autonomy as possible, only requiring them to pursue a specific and meaningful educational focus in order to receive approval from the Ministry of Education. Erik Fuchswalder, MdR LVP-Kuratha Klubobmann der Liberalen |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Charter school policy (free, privately run, publicly funded schools).
Old value:: Charter school funding, regulation, and development is left up to local governments.
Current: Charter schools must have a specific focus.
Proposed: Charter schools must have a specific focus.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:57:11, March 23, 2014 CET | From |  Hosianisch-Demokratisches Verbund | To | Debating the Einheitliches Gesetz für Charterschulen, 3639 |
| Message | Herr Präsident, I take it that a religious focus would also suffice? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 455 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 72 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 116 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Economic advance is not the same thing as human progress." - John Clapham |