We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Alcohol and Smoking Reform Act 3670
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grand Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3671
Description[?]:
| A common sense approach |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards alcoholic beverages.
Old value:: Alcoholic beverages may be purchased only from licensed sales outlets, and can only be available to adults.
Current: The sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages is outlawed.
Proposed: Alcoholic beverage regulations are not imposed by the government.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Sale of tobacco products.
Old value:: Only adults may purchase tobacco.
Current: There are certain restrictions on the sale of tobacco products but everyone is allowed to buy them.
Proposed: There are no regulations on the sale of tobacco.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:18:52, May 24, 2014 CET | From |  Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Alcohol and Smoking Reform Act 3670 |
| Message | "The Unionist Party stands diametrically opposed to the introduction of alcohol and tobacco purchasing power for children and young people. Our economy must remain regulated in terms of ensuring that vulnerable people do not have access to potentially damaging or addictive produce." Scott Kilkenny, Health Secretary |
| Date | 02:54:58, May 25, 2014 CET | From | Wolfpack | To | Debating the Alcohol and Smoking Reform Act 3670 |
| Message | Now we have seen it all. The Liberals are so decadent they wish to foist cigarettes on kiddies. James Cholmondely Wolfpack Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 215 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 210 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon |