Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 03:25:52
Server time: 04:34:07, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: democracy 2051

Details

Submitted by[?]: Libertarian party of Darnussia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2053

Description[?]:

...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:04:32, May 14, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the democracy 2051
Messageand this bill would not even be good for my own seats...

Date12:28:17, May 14, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the democracy 2051
Messageohw wait it doesn't... it improves me... the country party has 500,000 less votes then me but as many seats as me...

Date12:48:43, May 14, 2005 CET
FromLiberated Party
ToDebating the democracy 2051
MessageThis is a travesty of democracy.

Date22:50:44, May 14, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the democracy 2051
MessageThis makes no sense. We might as well put it back to giving larger regions a bigger advantage. THEY have more voters.

Date10:53:41, May 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the democracy 2051
MessageLiberated party: If you have watched our election results closely then you saw that under the system i proposed we got as much seats as we got voters, now it's not i might as well get 1 million more votes then you and still have less seats (although thats unlikely).

Date15:52:40, May 15, 2005 CET
FromLiberated Party
ToDebating the democracy 2051
MessageEffect on your electoral prospects is irrelevant - the idea that a region with fewer people should get more seats is simply ridiculous - far more fair would be a system giving advantage to larger regions, as with more popuulation, they should have more representatives. This bill is disgusting.

Date16:50:43, May 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the democracy 2051
Message... a region with fewer people IS GETTING MORE SEATS! AND THIS IS A SYSTEM GIVING ADVANTAGE TO LARGER REGIONS! THIS BILL DOES EXACTLY WHAT YOU WANT!

Date16:51:04, May 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the democracy 2051
Messageohw wait...

Date16:51:40, May 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the democracy 2051
Messagei screwed up myself :P i'm sorry :P this is the wrong bill... didn't wanted to propose this :P

Date16:54:02, May 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the democracy 2051
Messageohw well the current system is worse where small and larrge regions are looked upon as eqauls...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 236

no
    

Total Seats: 394

abstain
 

Total Seats: 49


Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism").

Random quote: "How many legs does a dog have if you call its tail a leg? Four. Calling a dog's tail a leg does not make it a leg." - Abraham Lincoln

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61