We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: 3689 C. 11: Religious Freedom Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3690
Description[?]:
| A bill to ensure the people of Aloria have the right to religious freedom. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:43:50, July 01, 2014 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the 3689 C. 11: Religious Freedom Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, It is incredibly important that religious freedom be maintained. No matter what religion you have taken up, you should not be forced by the government to abandon your faith and it's principles. The point of this bill is clear. No matter where you go, you should be able to worship your religion freely. Cathy Adeline (U-Kurmal) Union Party Leader |
| Date | 18:56:35, July 01, 2014 CET | From | Liberal Freedom Party | To | Debating the 3689 C. 11: Religious Freedom Act |
| Message | Press Release We applaud the Government for their stance on this matter, clearly there are some areas that we can and will agree on. Eleanor Garsdale LFP Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 249 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 205 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 198 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Proud Darnussians? Darnussian is an insult, nothing more! You should all try to be more like we are, the Narikatonites!" - Nikolai Shukanov, former Narikatonite politician |