We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Overhaul Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Freedom Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3690
Description[?]:
We call on Congress to free us from the shackles of this militaristic driven treaty. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the League of Nuclear Nations.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Current: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Proposed: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is allowed.
Current: The Government leaves this to the army to decide upon.
Proposed: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve a term in the military.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Proposed: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:37:45, July 01, 2014 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Military Overhaul Act |
Message | Press Release from the Ministry of Defense September 3689 Ministry of Defense Building, LlanymĂ´r, Sildar, Republic of Aloria I speak to you today to inform you of the dire consequences that will arise if the Military Overhaul Act is passed. The Republic of Aloria has long been a nation of freedom and liberty. The government must be prepared to defend our values, our people, and our interests abroad. This bill would undercut all of that. This bill would undercut the gains that we've made, and it would endanger our future endeavors. I ask the political parties in Congress to vote "no" to make sure that our armed forces are adequately armed so that our people may be safe. Defense Minister Paul Gibson |
Date | 20:42:17, July 01, 2014 CET | From | Liberal Freedom Party | To | Debating the Military Overhaul Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, I wonder what a silo full of nuclear missiles and biological weapons says about "our values, our people and our interests abroad." We can be so much better than this. I would like to state for the record that I am of course shocked that the military is not keen to have its biggest toys trimmed back, and God forbid a gay person should stray into the picture - who knows the horrors that will be unleashed! Mrs. Eleanor Garsdale, Leader LFP |
Date | 21:11:57, July 01, 2014 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Military Overhaul Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The correct place for sarcasm is on the Alorian Broadcasting Company's "Tuesday Night Live", not in the halls of this grand chamber. I would not address our national security issues in such a complacent manner. The safety of our nation, and the safety of Terran, does indeed lie on our military power. For without force, how would any of our domestic and international resolutions be enforced? As for the issue of homosexuals, the military is not a place to find a mate. That issue has no place in the military. Congresswoman Cathy Adeline (U-Kurmal) Union Party Leader |
Date | 23:25:30, July 01, 2014 CET | From | Liberal Freedom Party | To | Debating the Military Overhaul Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, I insist the Congresswoman retract her homophobic snide attempt at humour. By the precedent of her statement about finding a mate perhaps we should stop all workplaces allowing men and women working alongside each other for of course they are there to work and not to mate. Homosexuals are not animals who see another animal and just need to copulate. Grow up and open your eyes. The world of restrictive, bigoted little old men holding a nuclear bomb in one hand and their crotch in another is over. Here come the free thinking people who see how the world can look different. Yes peace has been kept in the past through obscene military force BUT that does not always have to be the way. Mrs. Michelle Gomez, LFP Deputy Leader |
Date | 23:48:07, July 01, 2014 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Military Overhaul Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Perhaps Mrs. Gomez could express her devotion to the issue in less foul terms. The Union Party has already expressed their position on the issue. This back-and-forth serves no purpose than to smear the opposing party, and there are other, more pressing, concerns to deal with at the moment. Congresswoman Cathy Adeline (U-Kurmal) Union Party Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 328 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 324 |
Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer. |
Random quote: "And what is Aleppo?" - Gary Johnson |