We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2052
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Calvinist Unionist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2052
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Social Calvinist Unionist Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Social Calvinist Unionist Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Social Calvinist Unionist Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Social Calvinist Unionist Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Seosavists Republican party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Social Calvinist Unionist Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Social Calvinist Unionist Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Catholic Peoples Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Christian Social Union
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:00:30, May 15, 2005 CET | From | Opinion Poll Vultures | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2052 |
| Message | im the one who called for the elections and i dont get a seat? :( |
| Date | 05:31:50, May 15, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2052 |
| Message | I only put in my political allies, sorry. I'm sure that if you won, then you wouldn't put potential enemies in your own cabinet. Besides, a Libertarian in a government run by anti-libertarians? Doesn't work out. |
| Date | 05:32:20, May 15, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2052 |
| Message | Oh yeah, and I put Labour in because he is the second largest party, thus making him important. |
| Date | 01:10:07, May 16, 2005 CET | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2052 |
| Message | why not put every party in there, because they're all important. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 346 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 103 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 59 |
| Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
| Random quote: "I bet their mothers don't love them. Many Trigunian women are so cold. I mean it's a racist hellhole in parts." - Tirza Sommer, former Dorvish politician |