We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Chemical regulation bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dark-Light Green Communist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3704
Description[?]:
| since we are not agreeing to ban all fungicide, then at at the very least, let's regulate them, chemical and pesticides as well as fundicides can be harmfull to others. Evgeny-Kathy Dark-Light Leader of the Dark-Light Communist Party |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning the use of pesticides.
Old value:: Farmers are required to list chemicals used on their crops.
Current: Farmers are required to list chemicals used on their crops.
Proposed: The government approves and regulates agricultural chemical use.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:05:17, July 30, 2014 CET | From | Partido Nacional | To | Debating the Chemical regulation bill |
| Message | Senor Presidente, In the interests of food safety and the health of the public, we would be willing to support this proposal for regulation of pesticides. Victorino Santillian Delegate Speaker Partido Nacional |
| Date | 02:39:16, July 31, 2014 CET | From | Progressive Workers of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Chemical regulation bill |
| Message | This bill does not go far enough, but is a step in the right direction nonetheless. |
| Date | 03:41:50, July 31, 2014 CET | From | Dark-Light Green Communist Party | To | Debating the Chemical regulation bill |
| Message | we are aware this bill does not go far enough, but we are doing a step foward and that step was necessary |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 112 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 39 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "While we may not always agree it is my hope that we may always be civil." - Jonathan Clarke, former Hutorian politician |