Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5480
Next month in: 01:10:35
Server time: 10:49:24, May 09, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): dannypk19 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religion Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Union of Progressive Ulama

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2165

Description[?]:

Islam is the faith of the people. This bill recognizes it as the state religion, while requiring no one to join if they do not wish.

This bill also guarantees complete freedom to all citizens to choose their own religion (including no religion if they wish).

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:54:12, January 01, 2006 CET
FromAl'Badaran Conservative Party
ToDebating the Religion Act
MessageI wonder about the nessecity for exempting people associated with religon from paying taxes in order to recognise it, charity of course should remain untaxed

Date05:10:00, January 02, 2006 CET
FromMajataran Capitalist Resurrection Party
ToDebating the Religion Act
MessageI have a question. In the case that the populatity of Islam falls them what are we to do? Change the State Religion? Then the state seems to populist and in the eyes of the world populist states are weak. And This could lead to futher exculsion of our non-Muslim populice.

Date05:35:19, January 02, 2006 CET
FromIshtirakiya Party
ToDebating the Religion Act
MessageThis bill claims to want to want to help muslims, but all it dose is alow all religions to become freely advertised, opress non-muslim minorities, allow religions to make profits, and allow anyone within our borders claiming to be a "missionary". Though the Ishtriakiya Party is based on muslim teachings, we do not want to allow Islam to be corrupted by laws like these.

Date05:37:42, January 02, 2006 CET
FromIshtirakiya Party
ToDebating the Religion Act
MessageIn a more specific matter, religions should be taxed, as to keep greedy people from masquarading in a holy outfit in order to make money, religions should not be allowed to advertise, as it draws away from the real meaning of faith, and not everyone claiming to be a "missionary" should be let in Al'badara. Islam, however, DOSE need to become the state religion.

Date09:45:51, January 02, 2006 CET
FromAl'Badaran Conservative Party
ToDebating the Religion Act
MessageI suggest that current policy be kep in Act 1,2 and 3

We agree whole-heartedly with Act 4

Date17:16:08, January 02, 2006 CET
FromUnion of Progressive Ulama
ToDebating the Religion Act
MessageThe UPU does not expect this act to pass. It is wholly in keeping with our interpretation of religioous prinples as a democratic Islamic party, however, so we are going to make the attempt.

Since there is some support for the state religion article, it has been split into a separate bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 134

no
    

Total Seats: 392

abstain
   

Total Seats: 224


Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

Random quote: "In politics, madame, you need two things: friends, but above all an enemy." - Brian Mulroney

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72