We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protect Adoptees Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic-Republican Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2166
Description[?]:
| We must make sure no paedophiles are able to adopt children. We must do exhaustive checks on all of those wishing to adopt. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning adoption.
Old value:: Adoption is regulated by the government. Applicants can adopt after a routine check-up.
Current: Adoption is regulated by the government. Applicants can adopt after a routine check-up.
Proposed: Adoption is strictly regulated by the government. Only by passing several tests and by following an intensive program applicants can adopt children.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:28:07, January 03, 2006 CET | From | Global Democracy Movement Party | To | Debating the Protect Adoptees Act |
| Message | If we didn't know i would say that the democratic that your party uses in the name is nothing more than a joke. If your party want's to protect the adopted children, you can't have an intensive program for applicants, that's pure burocracy, that mesure will only turn adoption more restricted and hard to do, untill then children will be left alone in worst conditions, that having a real family to take care of them. A routine Check-up is more than enough to see if the applicants are able to adopt a children. If the government start's to regulate the creation of families, where it's gonna end? Restricting families to have one child? Adoption is regulated by the government fair enough, we agree, but with the less possible burocracy in the middle. It's not in the best intrest of the children to wait 4 or 5 years to be adopted. |
| Date | 17:17:16, January 03, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Protect Adoptees Act |
| Message | Against. massive invasion of civil liberties. |
| Date | 18:01:32, January 03, 2006 CET | From | Global Democracy Movement Party | To | Debating the Protect Adoptees Act |
| Message | WOW .... ok in this one i was expecting you would vote against, we are against as well, this need's celebration want to go out to dinner. Your party made one good choice, we are amazed. |
| Date | 18:18:03, January 03, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Protect Adoptees Act |
| Message | Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit! |
| Date | 18:55:40, January 03, 2006 CET | From | Global Democracy Movement Party | To | Debating the Protect Adoptees Act |
| Message | No, we don't agree with that, sarcasm could be used in a good or a bad way, with you i use it in a good way, and the invitation for dinner was for real. think about my sarcasm as a way to be fun, or not, but it has that humoristic non agressive type of being. Sarcasm is the highest point of humor. I use all my power's for good, like superman, but we didn't use sarcasm a lot. |
| Date | 19:28:58, January 03, 2006 CET | From | Global Democracy Movement Party | To | Debating the Protect Adoptees Act |
| Message | He (superman) didn't use sarcasm a lot, it was a mistake that i need to correct, because we use sarcams several times. |
| Date | 00:23:06, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Democratic-Republican Party | To | Debating the Protect Adoptees Act |
| Message | The check-up is nowhere near enough. Children are better under the care of the government than of paedophiles and child abusers. |
| Date | 15:39:05, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Protect Adoptees Act |
| Message | Unneccesary bureaucracy. |
| Date | 16:42:54, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Protect Adoptees Act |
| Message | This is not against anyones civil liberties...i mean its protecting the childern for gods sake. And thats why it is important. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 196 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 97 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "Racism is man's gravest threat to man - the maximum of hatred for a minimum of reason." - Abraham Joshua Heschel |