Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 03:34:53
Server time: 04:25:06, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Marriage Freedom Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Grand Nationalist Fraction

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 3751

Description[?]:

Polygamy is a commitment which should be allowed all over the nation. No Province should be able to ban polygamy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:35:15, October 28, 2014 CET
FromSocial Libermuns Party
ToDebating the Marriage Freedom Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

We will always support the freedom of love and marriage. There is no need for this policing of relationships.

~

Rowan Argall
FISH Head

Date23:52:35, October 28, 2014 CET
FromConservative Monarchist Alliance
ToDebating the Marriage Freedom Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

We would like to see the Presidium to go further, and establish one-man-one-woman marriage throughout the whole of Lodamun.

Ignatz Linden
Social Affairs spokesman

Date15:03:10, October 29, 2014 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the Marriage Freedom Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

A very narrow vote changed that law: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=420292
Hopefully we can return to the old law.

And the CMA has clearly expressed its intentions to have Lodamun governed by Hosian law, not Lodamese Nationalist law. Lodamun will not become a Hosian nation.

--

George Huddleson,
Opposition Spokesman on Justice

Date17:06:32, October 30, 2014 CET
FromPeople of Freedom (P.F)
ToDebating the Marriage Freedom Act
MessageMr. Speaker.

Another great shame.

Matteo Powers
JDP Leader

Date17:08:00, October 30, 2014 CET
FromPeople of Freedom (P.F)
ToDebating the Marriage Freedom Act
MessageMr. Speaker.

The LNC total disregard of people on Lodamun that think differently will come back to haunt the LNC.

Matteo Powers
JDP Leader

Date19:24:00, October 30, 2014 CET
FromGrand Nationalist Fraction
ToDebating the Marriage Freedom Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

why should this motion be a disregard? We stand for civil liberties, and the choice of monogamy is a civil liberty, as well as the choice of polygamy. Some of our members, myself included, are polygamous. That is their own choice. Both my wives and I made this choice at free will. I was married to my first wife when I met my second wife. I had the choice: get a divorce, get into adultery or marry both. There were a lot of long conversations with the three parties involved. The polygamous solution prooved to be the best.
My wives and I are one happy family, kids included...

Paul Murphy-Spaak Jr.
LNC chairman

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 246

no
  

Total Seats: 119

abstain
   

Total Seats: 234


Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

Random quote: "When women are depressed, they either eat or go shopping. Men invade another country. It's a whole different way of thinking." - Elaine Boosler

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67