We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Science and Technology Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Zardio Federisma Partio
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3750
Description[?]:
An act to reform some of the science policies and laws of the government. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Protection of original works of technology and arts.
Old value:: Works of techology and art have limited copy protection.
Current: Technology and art are part of the commons and are not protected by copyright.
Proposed: Works of technology and art are protected by copyright.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards the cloning of human beings.
Old value:: Research in cloning technologies is legal, but regulated.
Current: Research in cloning technologies is legal, but regulated.
Proposed: The cloning of human beings is illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 11:16:56, October 27, 2014 CET | From | Socialdemokratia Partio - Keruloismo | To | Debating the Science and Technology Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, I ask the ZPP to split up this bill as article 1 has nothing to do with article 2. Besides that, we think Copyright should be abolished. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes |
Total Seats: 650 | |
no | Total Seats: 0 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "I do not believe that the United States should be bound by the same rules as the smallest African nation. Life isn't like that." - Richard Perle |