We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Search Warrants Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ecumenical Constitutional Democrat Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3774
Description[?]:
| Mr Speaker, The bloody-minded Police cannot be trusted to use discretion, years of totalitarian nationalist brainwashing and their use as blood-hounds in the persecution of believers makes them clearly biased. The judiciary must assert control, and prevent the police ran-sacking the homes of believers and other dissidents on account of imaginary "imminent crimes." |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Police searches.
Old value:: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court or have reasonable grounds to suspect that a crime was committed.
Current: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court or have reasonable grounds to suspect that a crime was committed.
Proposed: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:08:19, December 16, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Search Warrants Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, this will slow down our justice system. Anders Murphy LNC spokesman |
| Date | 13:02:08, December 16, 2014 CET | From | Ecumenical Constitutional Democrat Party | To | Debating the Search Warrants Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, There is no justice in Mr, Murphy's system! |
| Date | 20:36:02, December 16, 2014 CET | From | People of Freedom (P.F) | To | Debating the Search Warrants Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker. With the amount of terrorists that try to infiltrate Lodamun on constant basis. We need current legislation to keep Lodamun safe. Raven Valentinn Minister of Justice |
| Date | 20:58:26, December 16, 2014 CET | From |  Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Search Warrants Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The FWP disagrees with Raven Valentinn. They have voted in favour of this bill because they are sleeping with the Monotheist Brotherhood. We cannot believe that the new FSA will be someone from a party that supports this bill. We urge the FWP to either revoke their support for this bill, or for Wolfe Stanford to refuse his nomination to the post of NSA. The FWP is clearly not interested in our national security. -- Andre Fertig, Chairman of the GNRG |
| Date | 23:04:56, December 16, 2014 CET | From | Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Search Warrants Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, All of a sudden, Wolfe Stanford's party opposes this bill and supports another bill by the Monotheist Brotherhood that they previously opposed. Wolfe Stanford and his party need to make up their minds. -- Andre Fertig, Chairman of the GNRG |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 166 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 311 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 122 |
| Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "In Germany they first came for the Communists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me--and by that time no one was left to speak up." - Pastor Martin Niemoller |