Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5476
Next month in: 00:20:58
Server time: 15:39:01, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): NL | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Secularism Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Disbanded

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3785

Description[?]:

This Act restricts the ability of religion to influence Hutori society.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:24:26, January 05, 2015 CET
FromHutori Communist Union
ToDebating the Secularism Act
MessageSupported.

Date07:45:03, January 07, 2015 CET
FromConservative People's Party
ToDebating the Secularism Act
MessageWe would support Article 7, everything else is against our platform.

Date20:05:48, January 07, 2015 CET
FromFederal Heritage Party of Hutori
ToDebating the Secularism Act
MessageWe cannot support this bill in it's entirety. Furthermore it is the belief of the federalist party that this is an infringement on the citizens right to both freedom of religion and the right to peaceably assemble (see article 1). And we would also like to point out that religious schools are not fund by the state and in fact are private institutions. As for remuneration, do ministers not deserve some monetary compensation so that they may subsist?

Date20:15:05, January 07, 2015 CET
FromDisbanded
ToDebating the Secularism Act
Message1. The right to freedom of religion also includes a right to freedom from religion. The current situation is a severe infringement upon the rights (notably the aforementioned right to freedom of / from religion) of children and dependent adults.
2. Just as the right to property does not allow a person to keep stolen goods, the right to assemble peacefully does not allow persons to participate in activities which lead to infringements upon the rights of others (in this case, a child's / dependent adult's right to freedom of / from religion).

Date20:25:06, January 07, 2015 CET
FromFederal Heritage Party of Hutori
ToDebating the Secularism Act
MessageThat is why there are regulations so that we can insure that each school is teaching a standardized curriculum alongside what ever religious curriculum that institution may have. And by outlawing all religious schools that would also include seminaries which just like any college would be up to the student to attend. So yes it would still be an infringement upon citizen's right especially since you didn't add any conditions. And perhaps if your true intent is to "protect" minors and dependent adults you should teach them about different religions and points of view so that they may make an informed decision for themselves.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 277

no
  

Total Seats: 248

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

    Random quote: "I have opinions of my own - strong opinions. But I don't always agree with them." - George W. Bush

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 96