Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5474
Next month in: 03:45:34
Server time: 20:14:25, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): echizen | luthorian3059 | Mity1 | rezins | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 3792

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Solentia (CPS)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 3794

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:26:37, January 27, 2015 CET
FromCommunist Party of Solentia (CPS)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 3792
MessageWe want to know what do you think of the proposal

Date13:12:28, January 27, 2015 CET
FromRadical Republican Party (RRP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 3792
MessageWhen the election result was presented it stood cleare. RCS took a step to the right, since we - the liberal conservatives now have the majority within RCS.

I'm not eager to be a part of a socialist cabinet, but SDP have been very generous towards us. Giving us the heavy ministries of finance, internal affairs and defence. So i'm willing to agree to this on one condition: We will not be forced to vote for socialist bills.

Do we have an agreement?

Russell James
Chairman of RM (Majority party in RCS)

Date07:49:32, January 28, 2015 CET
FromCommunist Party of Solentia (CPS)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 3792
MessageYes, we have an agreement. What does UDP think?

Date14:51:17, January 28, 2015 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 3792
MessageUDP supports this cabinet proposal.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 119

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
  

Total Seats: 105


Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play".

Random quote: "I think it's about time we voted for senators with breasts. After all, we've been voting for boobs long enough." - Clarie Sargent

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 50