Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:37:28
Server time: 18:22:31, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Modernizing Aloria

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Liberty Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3798

Description[?]:

These laws are outdated and embarrassing on the national stage, We are a country of freedom and shouldn't be coercing our population thusly.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:00:20, February 02, 2015 CET
From New Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Modernizing Aloria
MessageI support all except Article 1.

Date03:31:58, February 02, 2015 CET
From Comiwnyddion Hosnogol
ToDebating the Modernizing Aloria
MessageDerek Powell, MP Kurmal

Oh great, just what Aloria needs, another liberal party with no respect for our nation's heritage. Obviously opposed.

Date20:28:46, February 02, 2015 CET
From Hosian-Non Hosian Alliance Party(HNHP)
ToDebating the Modernizing Aloria
MessageMr.Speaker,

How how earth did a communist party break through our ranks? We shall never support one bill you comies make, and we of course oppose this one.

Date21:29:04, February 02, 2015 CET
From New Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Modernizing Aloria
MessageHow is this a communist bill like really?

Date22:07:55, February 02, 2015 CET
From Social Liberty Party
ToDebating the Modernizing Aloria
MessageYeah, I'm not really a communist party at all, Removing legal consequences for being different religions is part of freedom of religion and necessary to a modern and free country. If you dislike the first article, I can propose this again without it.

Date22:08:43, February 02, 2015 CET
From Social Liberty Party
ToDebating the Modernizing Aloria
MessageArticle one has been removed

Date22:22:45, February 02, 2015 CET
From New Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Modernizing Aloria
MessageWill support

Date22:33:08, February 02, 2015 CET
From Social Liberty Party
ToDebating the Modernizing Aloria
MessageI do not seek to outlaw religion, I seek for coherency with freedom of religion. That you can become a member of any religion you like without legal consequences. That you may speak your mind without legal reprisals (which is an afront to the freedom of speech). The freedom to choose is all that I seek to establish. I would staunchly oppose any ban on religion of any kind.

You speak of heritage, But from what I have seen, These bills that violate our fundamental rights are new and do not represent our history.

Date22:33:10, February 02, 2015 CET
From Social Liberty Party
ToDebating the Modernizing Aloria
MessageI do not seek to outlaw religion, I seek for coherency with freedom of religion. That you can become a member of any religion you like without legal consequences. That you may speak your mind without legal reprisals (which is an afront to the freedom of speech). The freedom to choose is all that I seek to establish. I would staunchly oppose any ban on religion of any kind.

You speak of heritage, But from what I have seen, These bills that violate our fundamental rights are new and do not represent our history.

Date22:34:56, February 02, 2015 CET
From Social Liberty Party
ToDebating the Modernizing Aloria
MessageI will work with the opposition to make a mutually agreed upon bill as I already have.

Date23:43:37, February 03, 2015 CET
From New Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Modernizing Aloria
MessageIf needed, split each up in separate bills to improve chance of getting it passed.

Date07:24:42, February 08, 2015 CET
From Alorian Front Party
ToDebating the Modernizing Aloria
MessageSupport.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 278

no
  

Total Seats: 167

abstain
  

Total Seats: 100


Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

Random quote: "It is never too late to give up our prejudices." - Henry David Thoreau

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 83