Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 01:16:14
Server time: 18:43:45, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus19 | JourneyJak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: (ABTWDNETPATWITTWWNOI) Part 3.

Details

Submitted by[?]: LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2169

Description[?]:

A Bill That We Do Not Expect To Pass And Therefore Will Include Things That We Would Not Otherwise Include Part 3.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:17:31, January 07, 2006 CET
FromModerate Beluzians
ToDebating the (ABTWDNETPATWITTWWNOI) Part 3.
MessageNot happy with 40 seats? Why not create these bills individually? Some might actually pass.

Date07:03:48, January 07, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the (ABTWDNETPATWITTWWNOI) Part 3.
MessageYes, please stop creating these bills.

Date05:48:12, January 10, 2006 CET
FromModerate Beluzians
ToDebating the (ABTWDNETPATWITTWWNOI) Part 3.
MessageI wonder if this would work: We all vote to pass this. Therefore, we all gain the benefit from voting for a bill that passes. We possibly receive extra seats because of the breadth of changes. Then we create bills to change the parts we disagree with. Sound good?

Date08:11:39, January 10, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the (ABTWDNETPATWITTWWNOI) Part 3.
Messageooc:

I am not going to ruin the entire point of this game to "win". If TSP's bills are disruptive and unfair, we need to make it more clear to him. If he won't listen, we complain on the forum and to the mods. Under no circumstance am I going to vote for this crap however.

Date17:23:09, January 10, 2006 CET
FromLiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty
ToDebating the (ABTWDNETPATWITTWWNOI) Part 3.
MessageOOC:
These bills are not disruptive and unfair, they are allow by the game's rules.

Date20:19:41, January 10, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the (ABTWDNETPATWITTWWNOI) Part 3.
Messageooc: they seem to give you an advantage which makes the game less fun. If everyone except you feels that way we can either slowly fade away (like PAL), you can stop doing it, or we can complain and get a rule made. Those are the options as I see it.

Date16:48:37, January 11, 2006 CET
FromLiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty
ToDebating the (ABTWDNETPATWITTWWNOI) Part 3.
MessageThis PASSED?!?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 40

no
     

Total Seats: 37

abstain
  

Total Seats: 21


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "I don't believe you need to be bitch to succeed in business" - Lucinda Redwood, former Luthorian-Dorvish businesswoman

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 143