Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5480
Next month in: 00:24:25
Server time: 03:35:34, May 09, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nationalization act of 3832

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Solentia (CPS)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3832

Description[?]:

Power back to the people.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:33:05, April 05, 2015 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Nationalization act of 3832
Message"The Unionists would prefer an emergency code of practice instead- with the State subsidising failing industries that are vital to the national good. Would the SDP be willing to compromise?"

Brock Ryaine, Unionist Financial Lead

Date15:40:27, April 05, 2015 CET
From Liberal Democrats
ToDebating the Nationalization act of 3832
MessageThe liberal democrats doesn't support article 1 or the proposal made by the Unionist. The Unionist will be creating a "too big to fail"

Date18:41:37, April 05, 2015 CET
From Radical Republican Party (RRP)
ToDebating the Nationalization act of 3832
MessageTax payers sould not have to bail capitalists out when they lost on their financial gambles. Let them fall.

Edward Smith
Vice-chair NLP

Date19:01:41, April 05, 2015 CET
From Federal Green Party (FGP)
ToDebating the Nationalization act of 3832
Message^We agree with the Liberal Democrats and the NLP.

Date19:06:01, April 05, 2015 CET
From Communist Party of Solentia (CPS)
ToDebating the Nationalization act of 3832
MessageUnionists, if you mean nationalizing failing industries, then we support it. If you mean subsidizing private enterprises that face bankruptcy and they remain private then we strongly oppose.

Paul Broussard, SDP leader, President of Solentia

Date23:14:11, April 05, 2015 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Nationalization act of 3832
Message"Yes, we were referring to nationalising failing industries where they are essential to the national good."

Brock Ryaine, Unionist Financial Lead

Date07:40:33, April 06, 2015 CET
From Federal Green Party (FGP)
ToDebating the Nationalization act of 3832
MessageThat is better than subsidizing them, agreed. But we still prefer the current laws to either proposal.

Date23:54:09, April 15, 2015 CET
From Free Democratic Party
ToDebating the Nationalization act of 3832
MessageNatural Solentian corporatism will determine who is truly human.

Date09:10:08, April 16, 2015 CET
From SUN
ToDebating the Nationalization act of 3832
Messageooc: I never thought I'd say this, but I miss the LPS.

Date00:54:28, April 17, 2015 CET
From Free Democratic Party
ToDebating the Nationalization act of 3832
MessageOoc: lol

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 320

no
    

Total Seats: 205

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/

    Random quote: "'The illusion of Pontesi nationhood'. The Serpent speaks. How can they say these things? How can they call our country an illusion? You can see it clear as day, these people won’t stop until they’ve destroyed us all." - Morgan Einar, former Pontesian general

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 111